Artificial Intelligence Nanodegree

Computer Vision Capstone

Project: Facial Keypoint Detection


Welcome to the final Computer Vision project in the Artificial Intelligence Nanodegree program!

In this project, you’ll combine your knowledge of computer vision techniques and deep learning to build and end-to-end facial keypoint recognition system! Facial keypoints include points around the eyes, nose, and mouth on any face and are used in many applications, from facial tracking to emotion recognition.

There are three main parts to this project:

Part 1 : Investigating OpenCV, pre-processing, and face detection

Part 2 : Training a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to detect facial keypoints

Part 3 : Putting parts 1 and 2 together to identify facial keypoints on any image!


*Here's what you need to know to complete the project:

  1. In this notebook, some template code has already been provided for you, and you will need to implement additional functionality to successfully complete this project. You will not need to modify the included code beyond what is requested.

    a. Sections that begin with '(IMPLEMENTATION)' in the header indicate that the following block of code will require additional functionality which you must provide. Instructions will be provided for each section, and the specifics of the implementation are marked in the code block with a 'TODO' statement. Please be sure to read the instructions carefully!

  1. In addition to implementing code, there will be questions that you must answer which relate to the project and your implementation.

    a. Each section where you will answer a question is preceded by a 'Question X' header.

    b. Carefully read each question and provide thorough answers in the following text boxes that begin with 'Answer:'.

Note: Code and Markdown cells can be executed using the Shift + Enter keyboard shortcut. Markdown cells can be edited by double-clicking the cell to enter edit mode.

The rubric contains optional suggestions for enhancing the project beyond the minimum requirements. If you decide to pursue the "(Optional)" sections, you should include the code in this IPython notebook.

Your project submission will be evaluated based on your answers to each of the questions and the code implementations you provide.

Steps to Complete the Project

Each part of the notebook is further broken down into separate steps. Feel free to use the links below to navigate the notebook.

In this project you will get to explore a few of the many computer vision algorithms built into the OpenCV library. This expansive computer vision library is now almost 20 years old and still growing!

The project itself is broken down into three large parts, then even further into separate steps. Make sure to read through each step, and complete any sections that begin with '(IMPLEMENTATION)' in the header; these implementation sections may contain multiple TODOs that will be marked in code. For convenience, we provide links to each of these steps below.

Part 1 : Investigating OpenCV, pre-processing, and face detection

  • Step 0: Detect Faces Using a Haar Cascade Classifier
  • Step 1: Add Eye Detection
  • Step 2: De-noise an Image for Better Face Detection
  • Step 3: Blur an Image and Perform Edge Detection
  • Step 4: Automatically Hide the Identity of an Individual

Part 2 : Training a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to detect facial keypoints

  • Step 5: Create a CNN to Recognize Facial Keypoints
  • Step 6: Compile and Train the Model
  • Step 7: Visualize the Loss and Answer Questions

Part 3 : Putting parts 1 and 2 together to identify facial keypoints on any image!

  • Step 8: Build a Robust Facial Keypoints Detector (Complete the CV Pipeline)

Step 0: Detect Faces Using a Haar Cascade Classifier

Have you ever wondered how Facebook automatically tags images with your friends' faces? Or how high-end cameras automatically find and focus on a certain person's face? Applications like these depend heavily on the machine learning task known as face detection - which is the task of automatically finding faces in images containing people.

At its root face detection is a classification problem - that is a problem of distinguishing between distinct classes of things. With face detection these distinct classes are 1) images of human faces and 2) everything else.

We use OpenCV's implementation of Haar feature-based cascade classifiers to detect human faces in images. OpenCV provides many pre-trained face detectors, stored as XML files on github. We have downloaded one of these detectors and stored it in the detector_architectures directory.

Import Resources

In the next python cell, we load in the required libraries for this section of the project.

In [1]:
# Import required libraries for this section

%matplotlib inline

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import math
import cv2                     # OpenCV library for computer vision
from PIL import Image
import time 

Next, we load in and display a test image for performing face detection.

Note: by default OpenCV assumes the ordering of our image's color channels are Blue, then Green, then Red. This is slightly out of order with most image types we'll use in these experiments, whose color channels are ordered Red, then Green, then Blue. In order to switch the Blue and Red channels of our test image around we will use OpenCV's cvtColor function, which you can read more about by checking out some of its documentation located here. This is a general utility function that can do other transformations too like converting a color image to grayscale, and transforming a standard color image to HSV color space.

In [2]:
# Load in color image for face detection
image = cv2.imread('images/test_image_1.jpg')

# Convert the image to RGB colorspace
image = cv2.cvtColor(image, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)

# Plot our image using subplots to specify a size and title
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (8,8))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])

ax1.set_title('Original Image')
ax1.imshow(image)
Out[2]:
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fda31d54908>

There are a lot of people - and faces - in this picture. 13 faces to be exact! In the next code cell, we demonstrate how to use a Haar Cascade classifier to detect all the faces in this test image.

This face detector uses information about patterns of intensity in an image to reliably detect faces under varying light conditions. So, to use this face detector, we'll first convert the image from color to grayscale.

Then, we load in the fully trained architecture of the face detector -- found in the file haarcascade_frontalface_default.xml - and use it on our image to find faces!

To learn more about the parameters of the detector see this post.

In [3]:
# Convert the RGB  image to grayscale
gray = cv2.cvtColor(image, cv2.COLOR_RGB2GRAY)

# Extract the pre-trained face detector from an xml file
face_cascade = cv2.CascadeClassifier('detector_architectures/haarcascade_frontalface_default.xml')

# Detect the faces in image
faces = face_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray, 4, 6)

# Print the number of faces detected in the image
print('Number of faces detected:', len(faces))

# Make a copy of the orginal image to draw face detections on
image_with_detections = np.copy(image)

# Get the bounding box for each detected face
for (x,y,w,h) in faces:
    # Add a red bounding box to the detections image
    cv2.rectangle(image_with_detections, (x,y), (x+w,y+h), (255,0,0), 3)
    

# Display the image with the detections
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (8,8))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])

ax1.set_title('Image with Face Detections')
ax1.imshow(image_with_detections)
Number of faces detected: 13
Out[3]:
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fda314e1c50>

In the above code, faces is a numpy array of detected faces, where each row corresponds to a detected face. Each detected face is a 1D array with four entries that specifies the bounding box of the detected face. The first two entries in the array (extracted in the above code as x and y) specify the horizontal and vertical positions of the top left corner of the bounding box. The last two entries in the array (extracted here as w and h) specify the width and height of the box.


Step 1: Add Eye Detections

There are other pre-trained detectors available that use a Haar Cascade Classifier - including full human body detectors, license plate detectors, and more. A full list of the pre-trained architectures can be found here.

To test your eye detector, we'll first read in a new test image with just a single face.

In [4]:
# Load in color image for face detection
image = cv2.imread('images/james.jpg')

# Convert the image to RGB colorspace
image = cv2.cvtColor(image, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)

# Plot the RGB image
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (6,6))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])

ax1.set_title('Original Image')
ax1.imshow(image)
Out[4]:
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fda2c07dc88>

Notice that even though the image is a black and white image, we have read it in as a color image and so it will still need to be converted to grayscale in order to perform the most accurate face detection.

So, the next steps will be to convert this image to grayscale, then load OpenCV's face detector and run it with parameters that detect this face accurately.

In [5]:
# Convert the RGB  image to grayscale
gray = cv2.cvtColor(image, cv2.COLOR_RGB2GRAY)

# Extract the pre-trained face detector from an xml file
face_cascade = cv2.CascadeClassifier('detector_architectures/haarcascade_frontalface_default.xml')

# Detect the faces in image
faces = face_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray, 1.25, 6)

# Print the number of faces detected in the image
print('Number of faces detected:', len(faces))

# Make a copy of the orginal image to draw face detections on
image_with_detections = np.copy(image)

# Get the bounding box for each detected face
for (x,y,w,h) in faces:
    # Add a red bounding box to the detections image
    cv2.rectangle(image_with_detections, (x,y), (x+w,y+h), (255,0,0), 3)
    

# Display the image with the detections
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (6,6))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])

ax1.set_title('Image with Face Detection')
ax1.imshow(image_with_detections)
Number of faces detected: 1
Out[5]:
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fda247d32b0>

(IMPLEMENTATION) Add an eye detector to the current face detection setup.

A Haar-cascade eye detector can be included in the same way that the face detector was and, in this first task, it will be your job to do just this.

To set up an eye detector, use the stored parameters of the eye cascade detector, called haarcascade_eye.xml, located in the detector_architectures subdirectory. In the next code cell, create your eye detector and store its detections.

A few notes before you get started:

First, make sure to give your loaded eye detector the variable name

eye_cascade

and give the list of eye regions you detect the variable name

eyes

Second, since we've already run the face detector over this image, you should only search for eyes within the rectangular face regions detected in faces. This will minimize false detections.

Lastly, once you've run your eye detector over the facial detection region, you should display the RGB image with both the face detection boxes (in red) and your eye detections (in green) to verify that everything works as expected.

In [6]:
# Make a copy of the original image to plot rectangle detections
image_with_detections = np.copy(image)   

# Loop over the detections and draw their corresponding face detection boxes
for (x,y,w,h) in faces:
    cv2.rectangle(image_with_detections, (x,y), (x+w,y+h),(255,0,0), 3)  
    
# Do not change the code above this comment!

    
## TODO: Add eye detection, using haarcascade_eye.xml, to the current face detector algorithm
## TODO: Loop over the eye detections and draw their corresponding boxes in green on image_with_detections

# Extract the pre-trained eye detector from an xml file
eye_cascade = cv2.CascadeClassifier('detector_architectures/haarcascade_eye.xml')

# Extract the face area in gray 
# gray_face = gray[y:y+h, x:x+w]
# Plot the image with both faces and eyes detected
# fig = plt.figure(figsize = (6,6))
# ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
# ax1.set_xticks([])
# ax1.set_yticks([])
# ax1.set_title('Gray face')
# ax1.imshow(gray_face)

# Detect the eyes in image
eyes = eye_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray, 1.1, 3)

# Print the number of faces detected in the image
print('Number of eyes detected:', len(eyes))

# Get the bounding box for each detected face
for (x,y,w,h) in eyes:
    # Add a green bounding box to the detections image
    cv2.rectangle(image_with_detections, (x,y), (x+w,y+h), (0,255,0), 3)



# Plot the image with both faces and eyes detected
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (6,6))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])

ax1.set_title('Image with Face and Eye Detection')
ax1.imshow(image_with_detections)
Number of eyes detected: 2
Out[6]:
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fda247b0240>

(Optional) Add face and eye detection to your laptop camera

It's time to kick it up a notch, and add face and eye detection to your laptop's camera! Afterwards, you'll be able to show off your creation like in the gif shown below - made with a completed version of the code!

Notice that not all of the detections here are perfect - and your result need not be perfect either. You should spend a small amount of time tuning the parameters of your detectors to get reasonable results, but don't hold out for perfection. If we wanted perfection we'd need to spend a ton of time tuning the parameters of each detector, cleaning up the input image frames, etc. You can think of this as more of a rapid prototype.

The next cell contains code for a wrapper function called laptop_camera_face_eye_detector that, when called, will activate your laptop's camera. You will place the relevant face and eye detection code in this wrapper function to implement face/eye detection and mark those detections on each image frame that your camera captures.

Before adding anything to the function, you can run it to get an idea of how it works - a small window should pop up showing you the live feed from your camera; you can press any key to close this window.

Note: Mac users may find that activating this function kills the kernel of their notebook every once in a while. If this happens to you, just restart your notebook's kernel, activate cell(s) containing any crucial import statements, and you'll be good to go!

In [7]:
### Add face and eye detection to this laptop camera function 
# Make sure to draw out all faces/eyes found in each frame on the shown video feed

import cv2
import time 

# wrapper function for face/eye detection with your laptop camera
def laptop_camera_go():
    # Create instance of video capturer
    cv2.namedWindow("face detection activated")
    vc = cv2.VideoCapture(0)

    # Try to get the first frame
    if vc.isOpened(): 
        rval, frame = vc.read()
    else:
        rval = False
    
    # Keep the video stream open
    while rval:
        # Plot the image from camera with all the face and eye detections marked
        cv2.imshow("face detection activated", frame)
        
        # Exit functionality - press any key to exit laptop video
        key = cv2.waitKey(20)
        if key > 0: # Exit by pressing any key
            # Destroy windows 
            cv2.destroyAllWindows()
            
            # Make sure window closes on OSx
            for i in range (1,5):
                cv2.waitKey(1)
            return
        
        # Read next frame
        time.sleep(0.05)             # control framerate for computation - default 20 frames per sec
        rval, frame = vc.read()    
In [8]:
# Call the laptop camera face/eye detector function above
# laptop_camera_go()

Step 2: De-noise an Image for Better Face Detection

Image quality is an important aspect of any computer vision task. Typically, when creating a set of images to train a deep learning network, significant care is taken to ensure that training images are free of visual noise or artifacts that hinder object detection. While computer vision algorithms - like a face detector - are typically trained on 'nice' data such as this, new test data doesn't always look so nice!

When applying a trained computer vision algorithm to a new piece of test data one often cleans it up first before feeding it in. This sort of cleaning - referred to as pre-processing - can include a number of cleaning phases like blurring, de-noising, color transformations, etc., and many of these tasks can be accomplished using OpenCV.

In this short subsection we explore OpenCV's noise-removal functionality to see how we can clean up a noisy image, which we then feed into our trained face detector.

Create a noisy image to work with

In the next cell, we create an artificial noisy version of the previous multi-face image. This is a little exaggerated - we don't typically get images that are this noisy - but image noise, or 'grainy-ness' in a digitial image - is a fairly common phenomenon.

In [9]:
# Load in the multi-face test image again
image = cv2.imread('images/test_image_1.jpg')

# Convert the image copy to RGB colorspace
image = cv2.cvtColor(image, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)

# Make an array copy of this image
image_with_noise = np.asarray(image)

# Create noise - here we add noise sampled randomly from a Gaussian distribution: a common model for noise
noise_level = 40
noise = np.random.randn(image.shape[0],image.shape[1],image.shape[2])*noise_level

# Add this noise to the array image copy
image_with_noise = image_with_noise + noise

# Convert back to uint8 format
image_with_noise = np.asarray([np.uint8(np.clip(i,0,255)) for i in image_with_noise])

# Plot our noisy image!
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (8,8))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])

ax1.set_title('Noisy Image')
ax1.imshow(image_with_noise)
Out[9]:
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fda24707e10>

In the context of face detection, the problem with an image like this is that - due to noise - we may miss some faces or get false detections.

In the next cell we apply the same trained OpenCV detector with the same settings as before, to see what sort of detections we get.

In [10]:
# Convert the RGB  image to grayscale
gray_noise = cv2.cvtColor(image_with_noise, cv2.COLOR_RGB2GRAY)

# Extract the pre-trained face detector from an xml file
face_cascade = cv2.CascadeClassifier('detector_architectures/haarcascade_frontalface_default.xml')

# Detect the faces in image
faces = face_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray_noise, 4, 6)

# Print the number of faces detected in the image
print('Number of faces detected:', len(faces))

# Make a copy of the orginal image to draw face detections on
image_with_detections = np.copy(image_with_noise)

# Get the bounding box for each detected face
for (x,y,w,h) in faces:
    # Add a red bounding box to the detections image
    cv2.rectangle(image_with_detections, (x,y), (x+w,y+h), (255,0,0), 3)
    

# Display the image with the detections
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (8,8))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])

ax1.set_title('Noisy Image with Face Detections')
ax1.imshow(image_with_detections)
Number of faces detected: 11
Out[10]:
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fda246e3c18>

With this added noise we now miss one of the faces!

(IMPLEMENTATION) De-noise this image for better face detection

Time to get your hands dirty: using OpenCV's built in color image de-noising functionality called fastNlMeansDenoisingColored - de-noise this image enough so that all the faces in the image are properly detected. Once you have cleaned the image in the next cell, use the cell that follows to run our trained face detector over the cleaned image to check out its detections.

You can find its official documentation here and a useful example here.

Note: you can keep all parameters except photo_render fixed as shown in the second link above. Play around with the value of this parameter - see how it affects the resulting cleaned image.

In [11]:
## TODO: Use OpenCV's built in color image de-noising function to clean up our noisy image!


denoised_image = cv2.fastNlMeansDenoisingColored(image_with_noise,None,10,10,7,21)

# Display the image with the detections
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (8,8))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])

ax1.set_title('Denoised Image')
ax1.imshow(denoised_image)
Out[11]:
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fda24640d30>
In [12]:
## TODO: Run the face detector on the de-noised image to improve your detections and display the result

# Convert the RGB  image to grayscale
gray_denoised = cv2.cvtColor(denoised_image, cv2.COLOR_RGB2GRAY)

# Extract the pre-trained face detector from an xml file
face_cascade = cv2.CascadeClassifier('detector_architectures/haarcascade_frontalface_default.xml')

# Detect the faces in image
faces = face_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray_denoised, 4, 6)

# Print the number of faces detected in the image
print('Number of faces detected:', len(faces))

# Make a copy of the orginal image to draw face detections on
image_with_detections = np.copy(denoised_image)

# Get the bounding box for each detected face
for (x,y,w,h) in faces:
    # Add a red bounding box to the detections image
    cv2.rectangle(image_with_detections, (x,y), (x+w,y+h), (255,0,0), 3)
    

# Display the image with the detections
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (8,8))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])

ax1.set_title('Denoised Image with Face Detections')
ax1.imshow(image_with_detections)
Number of faces detected: 11
Out[12]:
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fda2461b198>

Step 3: Blur an Image and Perform Edge Detection

Now that we have developed a simple pipeline for detecting faces using OpenCV - let's start playing around with a few fun things we can do with all those detected faces!

Importance of Blur in Edge Detection

Edge detection is a concept that pops up almost everywhere in computer vision applications, as edge-based features (as well as features built on top of edges) are often some of the best features for e.g., object detection and recognition problems.

Edge detection is a dimension reduction technique - by keeping only the edges of an image we get to throw away a lot of non-discriminating information. And typically the most useful kind of edge-detection is one that preserves only the important, global structures (ignoring local structures that aren't very discriminative). So removing local structures / retaining global structures is a crucial pre-processing step to performing edge detection in an image, and blurring can do just that.

Below is an animated gif showing the result of an edge-detected cat taken from Wikipedia, where the image is gradually blurred more and more prior to edge detection. When the animation begins you can't quite make out what it's a picture of, but as the animation evolves and local structures are removed via blurring the cat becomes visible in the edge-detected image.

Edge detection is a convolution performed on the image itself, and you can read about Canny edge detection on this OpenCV documentation page.

Canny edge detection

In the cell below we load in a test image, then apply Canny edge detection on it. The original image is shown on the left panel of the figure, while the edge-detected version of the image is shown on the right. Notice how the result looks very busy - there are too many little details preserved in the image before it is sent to the edge detector. When applied in computer vision applications, edge detection should preserve global structure; doing away with local structures that don't help describe what objects are in the image.

In [13]:
# Load in the image
image = cv2.imread('images/fawzia.jpg')

# Convert to RGB colorspace
image = cv2.cvtColor(image, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)

# Convert to grayscale
gray = cv2.cvtColor(image, cv2.COLOR_RGB2GRAY)  

# Perform Canny edge detection
edges = cv2.Canny(gray,100,200)

# Dilate the image to amplify edges
edges = cv2.dilate(edges, None)

# Plot the RGB and edge-detected image
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (15,15))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(121)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])

ax1.set_title('Original Image')
ax1.imshow(image)

ax2 = fig.add_subplot(122)
ax2.set_xticks([])
ax2.set_yticks([])

ax2.set_title('Canny Edges')
ax2.imshow(edges, cmap='gray')
Out[13]:
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fda2458e5c0>

Without first blurring the image, and removing small, local structures, a lot of irrelevant edge content gets picked up and amplified by the detector (as shown in the right panel above).

(IMPLEMENTATION) Blur the image then perform edge detection

In the next cell, you will repeat this experiment - blurring the image first to remove these local structures, so that only the important boudnary details remain in the edge-detected image.

Blur the image by using OpenCV's filter2d functionality - which is discussed in this documentation page - and use an averaging kernel of width equal to 4.

In [14]:
### TODO: Blur the test imageusing OpenCV's filter2d functionality, 
# Use an averaging kernel, and a kernel width equal to 4
kernel_blur = np.ones((4,4),np.float32)/16
# Apply the blur kernal
gray_blurred = cv2.filter2D(gray,-1,kernel_blur)

## TODO: Then perform Canny edge detection and display the output

# Perform Canny edge detection
edges = cv2.Canny(gray_blurred,100,200)

# Dilate the image to amplify edges
edges = cv2.dilate(edges, None)

# Plot the RGB and edge-detected image
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (15,15))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(121)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])

ax1.set_title('Original Image')
ax1.imshow(image)

ax2 = fig.add_subplot(122)
ax2.set_xticks([])
ax2.set_yticks([])

ax2.set_title('Canny Edges after blurring')
ax2.imshow(edges, cmap='gray')
Out[14]:
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fda24534470>

Step 4: Automatically Hide the Identity of an Individual

If you film something like a documentary or reality TV, you must get permission from every individual shown on film before you can show their face, otherwise you need to blur it out - by blurring the face a lot (so much so that even the global structures are obscured)! This is also true for projects like Google's StreetView maps - an enormous collection of mapping images taken from a fleet of Google vehicles. Because it would be impossible for Google to get the permission of every single person accidentally captured in one of these images they blur out everyone's faces, the detected images must automatically blur the identity of detected people. Here's a few examples of folks caught in the camera of a Google street view vehicle.

Read in an image to perform identity detection

Let's try this out for ourselves. Use the face detection pipeline built above and what you know about using the filter2D to blur and image, and use these in tandem to hide the identity of the person in the following image - loaded in and printed in the next cell.

In [15]:
# Load in the image
image = cv2.imread('images/gus.jpg')

# Convert the image to RGB colorspace
image = cv2.cvtColor(image, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)

# Display the image
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (6,6))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])
ax1.set_title('Original Image')
ax1.imshow(image)
Out[15]:
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fda244508d0>

(IMPLEMENTATION) Use blurring to hide the identity of an individual in an image

The idea here is to 1) automatically detect the face in this image, and then 2) blur it out! Make sure to adjust the parameters of the averaging blur filter to completely obscure this person's identity.

In [16]:
## TODO: Implement face detection

# Convert the RGB  image to grayscale
gray = cv2.cvtColor(image, cv2.COLOR_RGB2GRAY)

# Extract the pre-trained face detector from an xml file
face_cascade = cv2.CascadeClassifier('detector_architectures/haarcascade_frontalface_default.xml')

# Detect the faces in image
faces = face_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray, 1.3, 5)

# Print the number of faces detected in the image
print('Number of faces detected:', len(faces))

# Make a copy of the orginal image to draw face detections on
image_with_detections = np.copy(image)

## TODO: Blur the bounding box around each detected face using an averaging filter and display the result

# Blur for each detected face
blur_level = 80
kernel_blur = np.ones((blur_level,blur_level),np.float32)/(blur_level*blur_level)
for (x,y,w,h) in faces:
    # Select the face area
    face = image_with_detections[y:y+h, x:x+w]
    # Blur the face 
    face_blurred = cv2.filter2D(face,-1,kernel_blur)
    # Put the blurred face back to the image
    image_with_detections[y:y+h, x:x+w] = face_blurred
    

# Display the image with the detections
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (6,6))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])

ax1.set_title('Image with blurred face')
ax1.imshow(image_with_detections)
Number of faces detected: 1
Out[16]:
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fda24428d30>

(Optional) Build identity protection into your laptop camera

In this optional task you can add identity protection to your laptop camera, using the previously completed code where you added face detection to your laptop camera - and the task above. You should be able to get reasonable results with little parameter tuning - like the one shown in the gif below.

As with the previous video task, to make this perfect would require significant effort - so don't strive for perfection here, strive for reasonable quality.

The next cell contains code a wrapper function called laptop_camera_identity_hider that - when called - will activate your laptop's camera. You need to place the relevant face detection and blurring code developed above in this function in order to blur faces entering your laptop camera's field of view.

Before adding anything to the function you can call it to get a hang of how it works - a small window will pop up showing you the live feed from your camera, you can press any key to close this window.

Note: Mac users may find that activating this function kills the kernel of their notebook every once in a while. If this happens to you, just restart your notebook's kernel, activate cell(s) containing any crucial import statements, and you'll be good to go!

In [17]:
### Insert face detection and blurring code into the wrapper below to create an identity protector on your laptop!
import cv2
import time 

def laptop_camera_go():
    # Create instance of video capturer
    cv2.namedWindow("face detection activated")
    vc = cv2.VideoCapture(0)

    # Try to get the first frame
    if vc.isOpened(): 
        rval, frame = vc.read()
    else:
        rval = False
    
    # Keep video stream open
    while rval:
        # Plot image from camera with detections marked
        cv2.imshow("face detection activated", frame)
        
        # Exit functionality - press any key to exit laptop video
        key = cv2.waitKey(20)
        if key > 0: # Exit by pressing any key
            # Destroy windows
            cv2.destroyAllWindows()
            
            for i in range (1,5):
                cv2.waitKey(1)
            return
        
        # Read next frame
        time.sleep(0.05)             # control framerate for computation - default 20 frames per sec
        rval, frame = vc.read()    
        
In [18]:
# Run laptop identity hider
#laptop_camera_go()

Step 5: Create a CNN to Recognize Facial Keypoints

OpenCV is often used in practice with other machine learning and deep learning libraries to produce interesting results. In this stage of the project you will create your own end-to-end pipeline - employing convolutional networks in keras along with OpenCV - to apply a "selfie" filter to streaming video and images.

You will start by creating and then training a convolutional network that can detect facial keypoints in a small dataset of cropped images of human faces. We then guide you towards OpenCV to expanding your detection algorithm to more general images. What are facial keypoints? Let's take a look at some examples.

Facial keypoints (also called facial landmarks) are the small blue-green dots shown on each of the faces in the image above - there are 15 keypoints marked in each image. They mark important areas of the face - the eyes, corners of the mouth, the nose, etc. Facial keypoints can be used in a variety of machine learning applications from face and emotion recognition to commercial applications like the image filters popularized by Snapchat.

Below we illustrate a filter that, using the results of this section, automatically places sunglasses on people in images (using the facial keypoints to place the glasses correctly on each face). Here, the facial keypoints have been colored lime green for visualization purposes.

Make a facial keypoint detector

But first things first: how can we make a facial keypoint detector? Well, at a high level, notice that facial keypoint detection is a regression problem. A single face corresponds to a set of 15 facial keypoints (a set of 15 corresponding $(x, y)$ coordinates, i.e., an output point). Because our input data are images, we can employ a convolutional neural network to recognize patterns in our images and learn how to identify these keypoint given sets of labeled data.

In order to train a regressor, we need a training set - a set of facial image / facial keypoint pairs to train on. For this we will be using this dataset from Kaggle. We've already downloaded this data and placed it in the data directory. Make sure that you have both the training and test data files. The training dataset contains several thousand $96 \times 96$ grayscale images of cropped human faces, along with each face's 15 corresponding facial keypoints (also called landmarks) that have been placed by hand, and recorded in $(x, y)$ coordinates. This wonderful resource also has a substantial testing set, which we will use in tinkering with our convolutional network.

To load in this data, run the Python cell below - notice we will load in both the training and testing sets.

The load_data function is in the included utils.py file.

In [19]:
from utils import *

# Load training set
X_train, y_train = load_data()
print("X_train.shape == {}".format(X_train.shape))
print("y_train.shape == {}; y_train.min == {:.3f}; y_train.max == {:.3f}".format(
    y_train.shape, y_train.min(), y_train.max()))

# Load testing set
X_test, _ = load_data(test=True)
print("X_test.shape == {}".format(X_test.shape))
Using TensorFlow backend.
X_train.shape == (2140, 96, 96, 1)
y_train.shape == (2140, 30); y_train.min == -0.920; y_train.max == 0.996
X_test.shape == (1783, 96, 96, 1)

The load_data function in utils.py originates from this excellent blog post, which you are strongly encouraged to read. Please take the time now to review this function. Note how the output values - that is, the coordinates of each set of facial landmarks - have been normalized to take on values in the range $[-1, 1]$, while the pixel values of each input point (a facial image) have been normalized to the range $[0,1]$.

Note: the original Kaggle dataset contains some images with several missing keypoints. For simplicity, the load_data function removes those images with missing labels from the dataset. As an optional extension, you are welcome to amend the load_data function to include the incomplete data points.

Visualize the Training Data

Execute the code cell below to visualize a subset of the training data.

In [20]:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
%matplotlib inline

fig = plt.figure(figsize=(20,20))
fig.subplots_adjust(left=0, right=1, bottom=0, top=1, hspace=0.05, wspace=0.05)
for i in range(9):
    ax = fig.add_subplot(3, 3, i + 1, xticks=[], yticks=[])
    plot_data(X_train[i], y_train[i], ax)

For each training image, there are two landmarks per eyebrow (four total), three per eye (six total), four for the mouth, and one for the tip of the nose.

Review the plot_data function in utils.py to understand how the 30-dimensional training labels in y_train are mapped to facial locations, as this function will prove useful for your pipeline.

(IMPLEMENTATION) Specify the CNN Architecture

In this section, you will specify a neural network for predicting the locations of facial keypoints. Use the code cell below to specify the architecture of your neural network. We have imported some layers that you may find useful for this task, but if you need to use more Keras layers, feel free to import them in the cell.

Your network should accept a $96 \times 96$ grayscale image as input, and it should output a vector with 30 entries, corresponding to the predicted (horizontal and vertical) locations of 15 facial keypoints. If you are not sure where to start, you can find some useful starting architectures in this blog, but you are not permitted to copy any of the architectures that you find online.

In [21]:
# Import deep learning resources from Keras
from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Conv2D, MaxPooling2D, Dropout
from keras.layers import Flatten, Dense


## TODO: Specify a CNN architecture
# Your model should accept 96x96 pixel graysale images in
# It should have a fully-connected output layer with 30 values (2 for each facial keypoint)

model = Sequential()
model.add(Conv2D(filters=16, kernel_size=2, padding='same', activation='relu', input_shape=(96,96,1)))
model.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=2))
model.add(Dropout(0.3))
model.add(Conv2D(filters=32, kernel_size=2, padding='same', activation='relu'))
model.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=2))
model.add(Dropout(0.3))
model.add(Conv2D(filters=64, kernel_size=2, padding='same', activation='relu'))
model.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=2))
model.add(Dropout(0.3))
model.add(Dense(500, activation='relu'))
model.add(Dropout(0.4))
model.add(Dense(500, activation='relu'))
model.add(Flatten())
model.add(Dense(30))



# Summarize the model
model_config = model.get_config()
model.summary()
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type)                 Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================
conv2d_1 (Conv2D)            (None, 96, 96, 16)        80        
_________________________________________________________________
max_pooling2d_1 (MaxPooling2 (None, 48, 48, 16)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_1 (Dropout)          (None, 48, 48, 16)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
conv2d_2 (Conv2D)            (None, 48, 48, 32)        2080      
_________________________________________________________________
max_pooling2d_2 (MaxPooling2 (None, 24, 24, 32)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_2 (Dropout)          (None, 24, 24, 32)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
conv2d_3 (Conv2D)            (None, 24, 24, 64)        8256      
_________________________________________________________________
max_pooling2d_3 (MaxPooling2 (None, 12, 12, 64)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_3 (Dropout)          (None, 12, 12, 64)        0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_1 (Dense)              (None, 12, 12, 500)       32500     
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_4 (Dropout)          (None, 12, 12, 500)       0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_2 (Dense)              (None, 12, 12, 500)       250500    
_________________________________________________________________
flatten_1 (Flatten)          (None, 72000)             0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_3 (Dense)              (None, 30)                2160030   
=================================================================
Total params: 2,453,446
Trainable params: 2,453,446
Non-trainable params: 0
_________________________________________________________________

Step 6: Compile and Train the Model

After specifying your architecture, you'll need to compile and train the model to detect facial keypoints'

(IMPLEMENTATION) Compile and Train the Model

Use the compile method to configure the learning process. Experiment with your choice of optimizer; you may have some ideas about which will work best (SGD vs. RMSprop, etc), but take the time to empirically verify your theories.

Use the fit method to train the model. Break off a validation set by setting validation_split=0.2. Save the returned History object in the history variable.

Your model is required to attain a validation loss (measured as mean squared error) of at least XYZ. When you have finished training, save your model as an HDF5 file with file path my_model.h5.

In [22]:
from keras.optimizers import SGD, RMSprop, Adagrad, Adadelta, Adam, Adamax, Nadam
from keras.callbacks import ModelCheckpoint

## TODO: Compile the model
model.compile(optimizer='RMSprop', loss='mean_squared_error', metrics=['accuracy'])

## TODO: Train the model
epochs = 150
checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint(filepath='weights.best.from_RMSprop', 
                               verbose=1, save_best_only=True)
history = model.fit(X_train, y_train,
          epochs=epochs, batch_size=20, validation_split=0.2, callbacks=[checkpointer], verbose=1)

## TODO: Save the model as model.h5
model.save('my_model.h5')
Train on 1712 samples, validate on 428 samples
Epoch 1/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1398 - acc: 0.6671Epoch 00000: val_loss improved from inf to 0.00805, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 6s - loss: 0.1388 - acc: 0.6676 - val_loss: 0.0080 - val_acc: 0.6963
Epoch 2/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0057 - acc: 0.7065Epoch 00001: val_loss improved from 0.00805 to 0.00461, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0057 - acc: 0.7074 - val_loss: 0.0046 - val_acc: 0.6963
Epoch 3/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0048 - acc: 0.7088Epoch 00002: val_loss improved from 0.00461 to 0.00420, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0048 - acc: 0.7074 - val_loss: 0.0042 - val_acc: 0.6963
Epoch 4/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0045 - acc: 0.7059Epoch 00003: val_loss improved from 0.00420 to 0.00415, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0044 - acc: 0.7074 - val_loss: 0.0041 - val_acc: 0.6963
Epoch 5/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0041 - acc: 0.7129Epoch 00004: val_loss improved from 0.00415 to 0.00399, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0041 - acc: 0.7138 - val_loss: 0.0040 - val_acc: 0.7056
Epoch 6/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0039 - acc: 0.7065Epoch 00005: val_loss improved from 0.00399 to 0.00383, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0039 - acc: 0.7050 - val_loss: 0.0038 - val_acc: 0.7266
Epoch 7/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0037 - acc: 0.7100Epoch 00006: val_loss improved from 0.00383 to 0.00382, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0037 - acc: 0.7097 - val_loss: 0.0038 - val_acc: 0.7150
Epoch 8/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0034 - acc: 0.7106Epoch 00007: val_loss improved from 0.00382 to 0.00350, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0034 - acc: 0.7097 - val_loss: 0.0035 - val_acc: 0.7407
Epoch 9/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0032 - acc: 0.7224Epoch 00008: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0032 - acc: 0.7225 - val_loss: 0.0036 - val_acc: 0.7453
Epoch 10/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0030 - acc: 0.7259Epoch 00009: val_loss improved from 0.00350 to 0.00285, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0030 - acc: 0.7272 - val_loss: 0.0029 - val_acc: 0.7009
Epoch 11/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0027 - acc: 0.7365Epoch 00010: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0027 - acc: 0.7360 - val_loss: 0.0034 - val_acc: 0.6986
Epoch 12/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0026 - acc: 0.7353Epoch 00011: val_loss improved from 0.00285 to 0.00282, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0026 - acc: 0.7354 - val_loss: 0.0028 - val_acc: 0.7009
Epoch 13/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0024 - acc: 0.7335Epoch 00012: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0024 - acc: 0.7336 - val_loss: 0.0028 - val_acc: 0.7313
Epoch 14/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0024 - acc: 0.7388Epoch 00013: val_loss improved from 0.00282 to 0.00221, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0024 - acc: 0.7395 - val_loss: 0.0022 - val_acc: 0.7103
Epoch 15/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0022 - acc: 0.7341Epoch 00014: val_loss improved from 0.00221 to 0.00210, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0022 - acc: 0.7342 - val_loss: 0.0021 - val_acc: 0.7220
Epoch 16/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0021 - acc: 0.7535Epoch 00015: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0021 - acc: 0.7523 - val_loss: 0.0033 - val_acc: 0.7033
Epoch 17/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0021 - acc: 0.7418Epoch 00016: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0021 - acc: 0.7424 - val_loss: 0.0021 - val_acc: 0.7056
Epoch 18/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0020 - acc: 0.7447Epoch 00017: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0020 - acc: 0.7436 - val_loss: 0.0033 - val_acc: 0.7056
Epoch 19/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0020 - acc: 0.7459Epoch 00018: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0020 - acc: 0.7465 - val_loss: 0.0022 - val_acc: 0.7547
Epoch 20/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0019 - acc: 0.7535Epoch 00019: val_loss improved from 0.00210 to 0.00191, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0019 - acc: 0.7535 - val_loss: 0.0019 - val_acc: 0.7266
Epoch 21/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0019 - acc: 0.7612Epoch 00020: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0019 - acc: 0.7605 - val_loss: 0.0020 - val_acc: 0.7220
Epoch 22/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0018 - acc: 0.7606Epoch 00021: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0018 - acc: 0.7605 - val_loss: 0.0019 - val_acc: 0.7150
Epoch 23/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0017 - acc: 0.7641Epoch 00022: val_loss improved from 0.00191 to 0.00172, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0017 - acc: 0.7634 - val_loss: 0.0017 - val_acc: 0.7196
Epoch 24/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0017 - acc: 0.7665Epoch 00023: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0017 - acc: 0.7675 - val_loss: 0.0030 - val_acc: 0.7173
Epoch 25/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0017 - acc: 0.7576Epoch 00024: val_loss improved from 0.00172 to 0.00172, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0017 - acc: 0.7588 - val_loss: 0.0017 - val_acc: 0.7196
Epoch 26/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0016 - acc: 0.7724Epoch 00025: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0016 - acc: 0.7716 - val_loss: 0.0021 - val_acc: 0.7360
Epoch 27/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0016 - acc: 0.7765Epoch 00026: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0016 - acc: 0.7769 - val_loss: 0.0018 - val_acc: 0.7617
Epoch 28/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0016 - acc: 0.7788Epoch 00027: val_loss improved from 0.00172 to 0.00163, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0016 - acc: 0.7792 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7266
Epoch 29/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0015 - acc: 0.7835Epoch 00028: val_loss improved from 0.00163 to 0.00160, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0015 - acc: 0.7839 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7173
Epoch 30/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0014 - acc: 0.7894Epoch 00029: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0014 - acc: 0.7903 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7617
Epoch 31/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0014 - acc: 0.7741Epoch 00030: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0014 - acc: 0.7751 - val_loss: 0.0017 - val_acc: 0.7266
Epoch 32/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0014 - acc: 0.7771Epoch 00031: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0014 - acc: 0.7769 - val_loss: 0.0018 - val_acc: 0.7126
Epoch 33/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0014 - acc: 0.7818Epoch 00032: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0014 - acc: 0.7821 - val_loss: 0.0020 - val_acc: 0.7220
Epoch 34/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0014 - acc: 0.7829Epoch 00033: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0014 - acc: 0.7827 - val_loss: 0.0022 - val_acc: 0.7103
Epoch 35/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0014 - acc: 0.7794Epoch 00034: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0014 - acc: 0.7810 - val_loss: 0.0017 - val_acc: 0.7056
Epoch 36/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0013 - acc: 0.7829Epoch 00035: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0013 - acc: 0.7821 - val_loss: 0.0017 - val_acc: 0.7243
Epoch 37/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0013 - acc: 0.7729Epoch 00036: val_loss improved from 0.00160 to 0.00157, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0014 - acc: 0.7710 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7664
Epoch 38/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0013 - acc: 0.8000Epoch 00037: val_loss improved from 0.00157 to 0.00154, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0013 - acc: 0.7996 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 39/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0013 - acc: 0.7894Epoch 00038: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0013 - acc: 0.7891 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7500
Epoch 40/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0013 - acc: 0.7935Epoch 00039: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0013 - acc: 0.7938 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7407
Epoch 41/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.7935Epoch 00040: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.7938 - val_loss: 0.0017 - val_acc: 0.7407
Epoch 42/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.7924Epoch 00041: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.7932 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7500
Epoch 43/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.8053Epoch 00042: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.8055 - val_loss: 0.0018 - val_acc: 0.7570
Epoch 44/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.8088Epoch 00043: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.8072 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7547
Epoch 45/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.7894Epoch 00044: val_loss improved from 0.00154 to 0.00148, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.7909 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7266
Epoch 46/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.7982Epoch 00045: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.7979 - val_loss: 0.0031 - val_acc: 0.7664
Epoch 47/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.8041Epoch 00046: val_loss improved from 0.00148 to 0.00145, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.8043 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7640
Epoch 48/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.8065Epoch 00047: val_loss improved from 0.00145 to 0.00137, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.8055 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7570
Epoch 49/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.8018Epoch 00048: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0012 - acc: 0.8008 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7383
Epoch 50/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.8006Epoch 00049: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.8014 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7336
Epoch 51/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.8059Epoch 00050: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.8055 - val_loss: 0.0020 - val_acc: 0.7266
Epoch 52/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.7994Epoch 00051: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.7991 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7407
Epoch 53/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.7988Epoch 00052: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.7979 - val_loss: 0.0019 - val_acc: 0.7523
Epoch 54/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.7924Epoch 00053: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.7921 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7407
Epoch 55/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.8024Epoch 00054: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.8014 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7640
Epoch 56/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.8094Epoch 00055: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.8090 - val_loss: 0.0017 - val_acc: 0.7640
Epoch 57/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.8129Epoch 00056: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.8125 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7640
Epoch 58/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.8182Epoch 00057: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0011 - acc: 0.8172 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7523
Epoch 59/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0010 - acc: 0.8024    - Epoch 00058: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0010 - acc: 0.8014 - val_loss: 0.0017 - val_acc: 0.7477
Epoch 60/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0010 - acc: 0.8112Epoch 00059: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0010 - acc: 0.8107 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 61/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0010 - acc: 0.8118Epoch 00060: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0010 - acc: 0.8102 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7687
Epoch 62/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0010 - acc: 0.8112Epoch 00061: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0010 - acc: 0.8096 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7126
Epoch 63/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0010 - acc: 0.8029Epoch 00062: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0010 - acc: 0.8032 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7617
Epoch 64/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0010 - acc: 0.8135Epoch 00063: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0010 - acc: 0.8148 - val_loss: 0.0017 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 65/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.8609e-04 - acc: 0.8006Epoch 00064: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 9.8474e-04 - acc: 0.7996 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7664
Epoch 66/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0010 - acc: 0.8147    Epoch 00065: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 0.0010 - acc: 0.8143 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7547
Epoch 67/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.8239e-04 - acc: 0.8053Epoch 00066: val_loss improved from 0.00137 to 0.00132, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 9.8133e-04 - acc: 0.8067 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7477
Epoch 68/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.3682e-04 - acc: 0.8118Epoch 00067: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 9.3986e-04 - acc: 0.8113 - val_loss: 0.0017 - val_acc: 0.7500
Epoch 69/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.6272e-04 - acc: 0.8029Epoch 00068: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 9.6107e-04 - acc: 0.8032 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7640
Epoch 70/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.5313e-04 - acc: 0.8082Epoch 00069: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 9.5832e-04 - acc: 0.8084 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 71/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.1227e-04 - acc: 0.8276Epoch 00070: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 9.1244e-04 - acc: 0.8271 - val_loss: 0.0019 - val_acc: 0.7477
Epoch 72/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.5580e-04 - acc: 0.8212Epoch 00071: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 9.5294e-04 - acc: 0.8201 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7687
Epoch 73/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.5196e-04 - acc: 0.8124Epoch 00072: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 9.5146e-04 - acc: 0.8125 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 74/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.2848e-04 - acc: 0.8135Epoch 00073: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 9.3228e-04 - acc: 0.8125 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7664
Epoch 75/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.1255e-04 - acc: 0.8259Epoch 00074: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 9.1387e-04 - acc: 0.8248 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7547
Epoch 76/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.1522e-04 - acc: 0.8176Epoch 00075: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 9.1491e-04 - acc: 0.8183 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7593
Epoch 77/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.1355e-04 - acc: 0.8082Epoch 00076: val_loss improved from 0.00132 to 0.00126, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 9.1250e-04 - acc: 0.8078 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7640
Epoch 78/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.7934e-04 - acc: 0.8235Epoch 00077: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.8139e-04 - acc: 0.8230 - val_loss: 0.0017 - val_acc: 0.7593
Epoch 79/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.1272e-04 - acc: 0.8194Epoch 00078: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 9.1211e-04 - acc: 0.8207 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7523
Epoch 80/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.0023e-04 - acc: 0.8241Epoch 00079: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.9822e-04 - acc: 0.8236 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 81/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.8971e-04 - acc: 0.8135Epoch 00080: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.8856e-04 - acc: 0.8137 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7547
Epoch 82/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.8541e-04 - acc: 0.8253Epoch 00081: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.8434e-04 - acc: 0.8254 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7500
Epoch 83/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.6812e-04 - acc: 0.8159Epoch 00082: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.6745e-04 - acc: 0.8166 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7453
Epoch 84/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.7386e-04 - acc: 0.8241Epoch 00083: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.7667e-04 - acc: 0.8242 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 85/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.6059e-04 - acc: 0.8235Epoch 00084: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.5833e-04 - acc: 0.8242 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7570
Epoch 86/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.5337e-04 - acc: 0.8347Epoch 00085: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.5504e-04 - acc: 0.8353 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7547
Epoch 87/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.6179e-04 - acc: 0.8206Epoch 00086: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.6110e-04 - acc: 0.8218 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7664
Epoch 88/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.2208e-04 - acc: 0.8253Epoch 00087: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.1999e-04 - acc: 0.8254 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 89/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.2516e-04 - acc: 0.8382Epoch 00088: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.2513e-04 - acc: 0.8376 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7640
Epoch 90/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.3591e-04 - acc: 0.8212Epoch 00089: val_loss improved from 0.00126 to 0.00125, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.3366e-04 - acc: 0.8207 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 91/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.2447e-04 - acc: 0.8235Epoch 00090: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.2395e-04 - acc: 0.8242 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7617
Epoch 92/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.2719e-04 - acc: 0.8294Epoch 00091: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.2699e-04 - acc: 0.8294 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7664
Epoch 93/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.3050e-04 - acc: 0.8276Epoch 00092: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.3059e-04 - acc: 0.8283 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 94/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.2232e-04 - acc: 0.8282Epoch 00093: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.2185e-04 - acc: 0.8277 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 95/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.2094e-04 - acc: 0.8288Epoch 00094: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.1981e-04 - acc: 0.8294 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7757
Epoch 96/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.0399e-04 - acc: 0.8341Epoch 00095: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.0878e-04 - acc: 0.8341 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 97/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.9337e-04 - acc: 0.8353Epoch 00096: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.9430e-04 - acc: 0.8353 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7593
Epoch 98/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.9815e-04 - acc: 0.8182Epoch 00097: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.0388e-04 - acc: 0.8189 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7570
Epoch 99/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.0328e-04 - acc: 0.8312Epoch 00098: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 8.0193e-04 - acc: 0.8306 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7757
Epoch 100/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.8248e-04 - acc: 0.8312- Epoch 00099: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.8673e-04 - acc: 0.8306 - val_loss: 0.0017 - val_acc: 0.7664
Epoch 101/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.8269e-04 - acc: 0.8335Epoch 00100: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.8210e-04 - acc: 0.8347 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7593
Epoch 102/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.8397e-04 - acc: 0.8347Epoch 00101: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.8375e-04 - acc: 0.8335 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 103/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.7570e-04 - acc: 0.8165Epoch 00102: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.7538e-04 - acc: 0.8154 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7547
Epoch 104/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.5967e-04 - acc: 0.8329Epoch 00103: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.6381e-04 - acc: 0.8335 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7523
Epoch 105/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.5435e-04 - acc: 0.8259Epoch 00104: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.5219e-04 - acc: 0.8271 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 106/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.6921e-04 - acc: 0.8447Epoch 00105: val_loss improved from 0.00125 to 0.00122, saving model to weights.best.from_RMSprop
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.6907e-04 - acc: 0.8458 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 107/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.4782e-04 - acc: 0.8341Epoch 00106: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.4910e-04 - acc: 0.8329 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 108/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.5082e-04 - acc: 0.8335Epoch 00107: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.5071e-04 - acc: 0.8341 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 109/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.4387e-04 - acc: 0.8253Epoch 00108: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.4286e-04 - acc: 0.8254 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7757
Epoch 110/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.4931e-04 - acc: 0.8324- Epoch 00109: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.4960e-04 - acc: 0.8335 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 111/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.3850e-04 - acc: 0.8324- Epoch 00110: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.3777e-04 - acc: 0.8312 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 112/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.4692e-04 - acc: 0.8400Epoch 00111: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.4852e-04 - acc: 0.8394 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7617
Epoch 113/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.2402e-04 - acc: 0.8288Epoch 00112: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.2767e-04 - acc: 0.8289 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 114/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.4682e-04 - acc: 0.8229- Epoch 00113: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.4602e-04 - acc: 0.8236 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7640
Epoch 115/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.2606e-04 - acc: 0.8359Epoch 00114: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.2608e-04 - acc: 0.8364 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 116/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.4420e-04 - acc: 0.8465Epoch 00115: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.4492e-04 - acc: 0.8464 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7640
Epoch 117/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.3307e-04 - acc: 0.8406Epoch 00116: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.3214e-04 - acc: 0.8394 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7664
Epoch 118/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.0932e-04 - acc: 0.8406Epoch 00117: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.0875e-04 - acc: 0.8405 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7593
Epoch 119/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.1269e-04 - acc: 0.8347Epoch 00118: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.1358e-04 - acc: 0.8347 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 120/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.0766e-04 - acc: 0.8347Epoch 00119: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.1175e-04 - acc: 0.8347 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7640
Epoch 121/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.2495e-04 - acc: 0.8294Epoch 00120: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.2598e-04 - acc: 0.8300 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7593
Epoch 122/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.0837e-04 - acc: 0.8429Epoch 00121: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.0971e-04 - acc: 0.8435 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 123/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.1419e-04 - acc: 0.8324Epoch 00122: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.1591e-04 - acc: 0.8329 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7687
Epoch 124/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.0173e-04 - acc: 0.8341Epoch 00123: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.0090e-04 - acc: 0.8347 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7757
Epoch 125/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.0343e-04 - acc: 0.8471Epoch 00124: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.0339e-04 - acc: 0.8475 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 126/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.9396e-04 - acc: 0.8371Epoch 00125: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.9964e-04 - acc: 0.8364 - val_loss: 0.0019 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 127/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.0152e-04 - acc: 0.8394Epoch 00126: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.0104e-04 - acc: 0.8382 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 128/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.9062e-04 - acc: 0.8418Epoch 00127: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.9014e-04 - acc: 0.8423 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7430
Epoch 129/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.1579e-04 - acc: 0.8441Epoch 00128: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 7.1787e-04 - acc: 0.8429 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 130/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.0064e-04 - acc: 0.8371- Epoch 00129: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.9981e-04 - acc: 0.8382 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 131/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.6559e-04 - acc: 0.8382Epoch 00130: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.6799e-04 - acc: 0.8376 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 132/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.9685e-04 - acc: 0.8288Epoch 00131: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.9623e-04 - acc: 0.8283 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7687
Epoch 133/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.8098e-04 - acc: 0.8400Epoch 00132: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.7960e-04 - acc: 0.8394 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 134/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.9057e-04 - acc: 0.8406Epoch 00133: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.8986e-04 - acc: 0.8394 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 135/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.8173e-04 - acc: 0.8424Epoch 00134: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.8294e-04 - acc: 0.8411 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 136/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.7067e-04 - acc: 0.8429Epoch 00135: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.6918e-04 - acc: 0.8440 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 137/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.7482e-04 - acc: 0.8412Epoch 00136: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.7439e-04 - acc: 0.8411 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7664
Epoch 138/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.7510e-04 - acc: 0.8294Epoch 00137: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.7482e-04 - acc: 0.8294 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 139/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.7028e-04 - acc: 0.8394Epoch 00138: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.6897e-04 - acc: 0.8405 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7687
Epoch 140/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.6794e-04 - acc: 0.8318Epoch 00139: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.6730e-04 - acc: 0.8318 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 141/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.6004e-04 - acc: 0.8359Epoch 00140: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.6159e-04 - acc: 0.8353 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 142/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.7625e-04 - acc: 0.8476Epoch 00141: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.7701e-04 - acc: 0.8475 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7664
Epoch 143/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.4044e-04 - acc: 0.8559Epoch 00142: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.4079e-04 - acc: 0.8557 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 144/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.4261e-04 - acc: 0.8318Epoch 00143: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.4203e-04 - acc: 0.8329 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 145/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.6334e-04 - acc: 0.8529Epoch 00144: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.6481e-04 - acc: 0.8528 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7477
Epoch 146/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.4776e-04 - acc: 0.8418Epoch 00145: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.4819e-04 - acc: 0.8423 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7593
Epoch 147/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.5678e-04 - acc: 0.8506Epoch 00146: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.5594e-04 - acc: 0.8505 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 148/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.5874e-04 - acc: 0.8476Epoch 00147: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.5929e-04 - acc: 0.8487 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7547
Epoch 149/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.6925e-04 - acc: 0.8406Epoch 00148: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.6941e-04 - acc: 0.8417 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7617
Epoch 150/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.3536e-04 - acc: 0.8471Epoch 00149: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.3549e-04 - acc: 0.8470 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7710

Step 7: Visualize the Loss and Test Predictions

(IMPLEMENTATION) Answer a few questions and visualize the loss

Question 1: Outline the steps you took to get to your final neural network architecture and your reasoning at each step.

Answer: Step 1: I copied the CNN architecture from the previous Dog Project. It worked quite well in previous project, so I believe it is a good start here. Correct the shape of the input and output layers to fit our data.

Step 2: Dog project is a classification problem, but detecting facial keypoint is regression problem. So I have to remove the softmax activation from the output layer. And changed the loss functino to 'mean_squared_error'.

Step 3: I removed all the Dropout layers first and train with 30 epochs for simple and quick iteration.

Step 4: I added back Dropout layers layer by layer and tested again. The accuracy kept improving.

Step 5: After adding back all the Dropout layers, I can see that the accuracy graph showed an upward trend. So I increased the higher number of epochs until 150.

Question 2: Defend your choice of optimizer. Which optimizers did you test, and how did you determine which worked best?

Answer: I tested with RMSprop, SGD, Adagrad. You may see below, I trained 3 different models with the 3 optimizers respectively. At the end of training, I plot the accuracy on training data and validation data against number of epochs. I found that the accuracy on validation data of Adagrad model is the best among three, so Adagrad worked the best.

Use the code cell below to plot the training and validation loss of your neural network. You may find this resource useful.

In [23]:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
## TODO: Visualize the training and validation loss of your neural network
plt.plot(history.history['acc'])
plt.plot(history.history['val_acc'])
plt.title('model accuracy')
plt.ylabel('accuracy')
plt.xlabel('epoch')
plt.legend(['train', 'test'], loc='upper left')
plt.show()

Question 3: Do you notice any evidence of overfitting or underfitting in the above plot? If so, what steps have you taken to improve your model? Note that slight overfitting or underfitting will not hurt your chances of a successful submission, as long as you have attempted some solutions towards improving your model (such as regularization, dropout, increased/decreased number of layers, etc).

Answer: Yes, I saw overfitting: accuracy on training data improves along the way during training, but that on validation data drops. So I added more Dropout layers between layers, and added two large Dense layers at the end to tackle overfitting problem.

In [25]:
from keras.models import Model
In [28]:
## Train with optimizer -- SGD
## 
model_SGD = Sequential.from_config(model_config)
model_SGD.compile(optimizer='SGD', loss='mean_squared_error', metrics=['accuracy'])
checkpointer_SGD = ModelCheckpoint(filepath='weights.best.from_SGD', 
                               verbose=1, save_best_only=True)
history_SGD = model.fit(X_train, y_train,
          epochs=epochs, batch_size=20, validation_split=0.2, callbacks=[checkpointer_SGD], verbose=1)
model_SGD.save('my_model.h5.SGD')
Train on 1712 samples, validate on 428 samples
Epoch 1/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.1994e-04 - acc: 0.8471Epoch 00000: val_loss improved from inf to 0.00147, saving model to weights.best.from_SGD
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.1903e-04 - acc: 0.8458 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7430
Epoch 2/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.0986e-04 - acc: 0.8441Epoch 00001: val_loss improved from 0.00147 to 0.00124, saving model to weights.best.from_SGD
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.1014e-04 - acc: 0.8429 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 3/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.2090e-04 - acc: 0.8535Epoch 00002: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.1909e-04 - acc: 0.8528 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 4/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.0558e-04 - acc: 0.8418Epoch 00003: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.0481e-04 - acc: 0.8423 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.8014
Epoch 5/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.1505e-04 - acc: 0.8418Epoch 00004: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.1562e-04 - acc: 0.8417 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 6/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.9894e-04 - acc: 0.8312Epoch 00005: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.9826e-04 - acc: 0.8318 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7640
Epoch 7/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.1445e-04 - acc: 0.8500Epoch 00006: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.1589e-04 - acc: 0.8505 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 8/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.0029e-04 - acc: 0.8429Epoch 00007: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.0150e-04 - acc: 0.8435 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7664
Epoch 9/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.1015e-04 - acc: 0.8459Epoch 00008: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.1165e-04 - acc: 0.8452 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 10/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.9464e-04 - acc: 0.8518Epoch 00009: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.9529e-04 - acc: 0.8528 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 11/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.0133e-04 - acc: 0.8394Epoch 00010: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.0061e-04 - acc: 0.8400 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 12/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.9330e-04 - acc: 0.8412Epoch 00011: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.9357e-04 - acc: 0.8423 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7757
Epoch 13/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.0603e-04 - acc: 0.8512Epoch 00012: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.0630e-04 - acc: 0.8522 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 14/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 6.0541e-04 - acc: 0.8494Epoch 00013: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 6.0568e-04 - acc: 0.8487 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 15/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.7947e-04 - acc: 0.8529Epoch 00014: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.8150e-04 - acc: 0.8534 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 16/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.8732e-04 - acc: 0.8465Epoch 00015: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.8661e-04 - acc: 0.8464 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 17/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.7968e-04 - acc: 0.8459Epoch 00016: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.7922e-04 - acc: 0.8452 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7757
Epoch 18/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.8955e-04 - acc: 0.8512Epoch 00017: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.9065e-04 - acc: 0.8505 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7593
Epoch 19/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.8229e-04 - acc: 0.8447Epoch 00018: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.8262e-04 - acc: 0.8446 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7640
Epoch 20/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.8205e-04 - acc: 0.8576Epoch 00019: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.8177e-04 - acc: 0.8557 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7570
Epoch 21/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.5916e-04 - acc: 0.8471Epoch 00020: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.5948e-04 - acc: 0.8481 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 22/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.8331e-04 - acc: 0.8406Epoch 00021: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.8217e-04 - acc: 0.8411 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 23/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.8637e-04 - acc: 0.8471Epoch 00022: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.8699e-04 - acc: 0.8470 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 24/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.7429e-04 - acc: 0.8547Epoch 00023: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.7404e-04 - acc: 0.8557 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7687
Epoch 25/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.7013e-04 - acc: 0.8365Epoch 00024: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.6981e-04 - acc: 0.8376 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7757
Epoch 26/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.8715e-04 - acc: 0.8471Epoch 00025: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.8791e-04 - acc: 0.8481 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7383
Epoch 27/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.6601e-04 - acc: 0.8541Epoch 00026: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.6692e-04 - acc: 0.8546 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 28/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.8713e-04 - acc: 0.8447Epoch 00027: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.8622e-04 - acc: 0.8458 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 29/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.6838e-04 - acc: 0.8618- Epoch 00028: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.6917e-04 - acc: 0.8616 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7664
Epoch 30/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.6899e-04 - acc: 0.8541Epoch 00029: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.6901e-04 - acc: 0.8546 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7687
Epoch 31/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.6846e-04 - acc: 0.8418Epoch 00030: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.6834e-04 - acc: 0.8423 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 32/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.6189e-04 - acc: 0.8547Epoch 00031: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.6456e-04 - acc: 0.8534 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7617
Epoch 33/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.6531e-04 - acc: 0.8571Epoch 00032: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.6459e-04 - acc: 0.8557 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7687
Epoch 34/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.6066e-04 - acc: 0.8512Epoch 00033: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.6203e-04 - acc: 0.8516 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 35/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.5568e-04 - acc: 0.8647Epoch 00034: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.5574e-04 - acc: 0.8657 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 36/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.5377e-04 - acc: 0.8506Epoch 00035: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.5492e-04 - acc: 0.8511 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 37/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.5848e-04 - acc: 0.8576Epoch 00036: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.5835e-04 - acc: 0.8581 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7944
Epoch 38/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.6327e-04 - acc: 0.8459Epoch 00037: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.6253e-04 - acc: 0.8464 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7757
Epoch 39/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.5548e-04 - acc: 0.8553Epoch 00038: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.5499e-04 - acc: 0.8522 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7640
Epoch 40/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.5984e-04 - acc: 0.8500Epoch 00039: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.5894e-04 - acc: 0.8511 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7991
Epoch 41/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.3764e-04 - acc: 0.8588Epoch 00040: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.4120e-04 - acc: 0.8586 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 42/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.5256e-04 - acc: 0.8429Epoch 00041: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.5224e-04 - acc: 0.8440 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 43/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.4175e-04 - acc: 0.8512Epoch 00042: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.4067e-04 - acc: 0.8516 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7757
Epoch 44/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.5814e-04 - acc: 0.8441Epoch 00043: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.5896e-04 - acc: 0.8446 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 45/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.3960e-04 - acc: 0.8571Epoch 00044: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.3949e-04 - acc: 0.8575 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 46/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.4284e-04 - acc: 0.8488Epoch 00045: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.4307e-04 - acc: 0.8487 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7757
Epoch 47/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.5275e-04 - acc: 0.8465Epoch 00046: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.5245e-04 - acc: 0.8452 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7687
Epoch 48/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.4721e-04 - acc: 0.8412Epoch 00047: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.4924e-04 - acc: 0.8417 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 49/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.3577e-04 - acc: 0.8553Epoch 00048: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.3667e-04 - acc: 0.8557 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7664
Epoch 50/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.3814e-04 - acc: 0.8535Epoch 00049: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.3809e-04 - acc: 0.8546 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 51/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.4521e-04 - acc: 0.8471Epoch 00050: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.4589e-04 - acc: 0.8464 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 52/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.4004e-04 - acc: 0.8641Epoch 00051: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.4169e-04 - acc: 0.8627 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 53/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.3012e-04 - acc: 0.8465Epoch 00052: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.3012e-04 - acc: 0.8470 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 54/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.2884e-04 - acc: 0.8535Epoch 00053: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.2969e-04 - acc: 0.8534 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 55/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.4150e-04 - acc: 0.8559Epoch 00054: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.4188e-04 - acc: 0.8563 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 56/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.3626e-04 - acc: 0.8565Epoch 00055: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.3843e-04 - acc: 0.8551 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.8061
Epoch 57/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.1654e-04 - acc: 0.8635Epoch 00056: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.1692e-04 - acc: 0.8627 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 58/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.3653e-04 - acc: 0.8694Epoch 00057: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.3939e-04 - acc: 0.8697 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 59/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.2482e-04 - acc: 0.8582Epoch 00058: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.2396e-04 - acc: 0.8592 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 60/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.2341e-04 - acc: 0.8629Epoch 00059: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.2365e-04 - acc: 0.8621 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7757
Epoch 61/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.2702e-04 - acc: 0.8647Epoch 00060: val_loss improved from 0.00124 to 0.00122, saving model to weights.best.from_SGD
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.2595e-04 - acc: 0.8645 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 62/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.1476e-04 - acc: 0.8676Epoch 00061: val_loss improved from 0.00122 to 0.00121, saving model to weights.best.from_SGD
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.1390e-04 - acc: 0.8668 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 63/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.2800e-04 - acc: 0.8624Epoch 00062: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.2890e-04 - acc: 0.8627 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 64/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.1313e-04 - acc: 0.8441Epoch 00063: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.1580e-04 - acc: 0.8440 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.8061
Epoch 65/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.2959e-04 - acc: 0.8535Epoch 00064: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.2909e-04 - acc: 0.8540 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 66/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.1969e-04 - acc: 0.8600Epoch 00065: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.1976e-04 - acc: 0.8604 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7757
Epoch 67/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.2698e-04 - acc: 0.8565Epoch 00066: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.2751e-04 - acc: 0.8575 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 68/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.2254e-04 - acc: 0.8488Epoch 00067: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.2236e-04 - acc: 0.8493 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 69/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.0865e-04 - acc: 0.8547Epoch 00068: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.1152e-04 - acc: 0.8540 - val_loss: 0.0016 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 70/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.2259e-04 - acc: 0.8553Epoch 00069: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.2314e-04 - acc: 0.8563 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.8061
Epoch 71/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.0325e-04 - acc: 0.8500Epoch 00070: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.0323e-04 - acc: 0.8470 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 72/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.1733e-04 - acc: 0.8547Epoch 00071: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.1655e-04 - acc: 0.8557 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 73/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.1208e-04 - acc: 0.8541Epoch 00072: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.1183e-04 - acc: 0.8546 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 74/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.0843e-04 - acc: 0.8476Epoch 00073: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.0737e-04 - acc: 0.8481 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 75/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.0346e-04 - acc: 0.8665Epoch 00074: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.0333e-04 - acc: 0.8662 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 76/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.0224e-04 - acc: 0.8718- Epoch 00075: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.0234e-04 - acc: 0.8721 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 77/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.0456e-04 - acc: 0.8647- Epoch 00076: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.0599e-04 - acc: 0.8645 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7991
Epoch 78/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.0421e-04 - acc: 0.8553- Epoch 00077: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.0507e-04 - acc: 0.8563 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 79/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.0155e-04 - acc: 0.8635Epoch 00078: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.0052e-04 - acc: 0.8639 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 80/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.1411e-04 - acc: 0.8594Epoch 00079: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.1459e-04 - acc: 0.8581 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.8014
Epoch 81/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.0094e-04 - acc: 0.8553Epoch 00080: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.0045e-04 - acc: 0.8557 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 82/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.9952e-04 - acc: 0.8565- Epoch 00081: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.9900e-04 - acc: 0.8569 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 83/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.0340e-04 - acc: 0.8524- Epoch 00082: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.0346e-04 - acc: 0.8522 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 84/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.9835e-04 - acc: 0.8459Epoch 00083: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.9853e-04 - acc: 0.8440 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7991
Epoch 85/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.0706e-04 - acc: 0.8553Epoch 00084: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.0684e-04 - acc: 0.8563 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7687
Epoch 86/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.8995e-04 - acc: 0.8659Epoch 00085: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.9036e-04 - acc: 0.8645 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 87/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.9910e-04 - acc: 0.8594Epoch 00086: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.9866e-04 - acc: 0.8598 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 88/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.9935e-04 - acc: 0.8606Epoch 00087: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.9874e-04 - acc: 0.8610 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 89/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 5.0858e-04 - acc: 0.8506Epoch 00088: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 5.0836e-04 - acc: 0.8505 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 90/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.9186e-04 - acc: 0.8594Epoch 00089: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.9226e-04 - acc: 0.8586 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 91/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.8910e-04 - acc: 0.8659Epoch 00090: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.8892e-04 - acc: 0.8662 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 92/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.7389e-04 - acc: 0.8594Epoch 00091: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.7405e-04 - acc: 0.8598 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 93/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.9190e-04 - acc: 0.8535Epoch 00092: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.9235e-04 - acc: 0.8534 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 94/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.9774e-04 - acc: 0.8724Epoch 00093: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.9806e-04 - acc: 0.8727 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 95/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.9210e-04 - acc: 0.8635Epoch 00094: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.9272e-04 - acc: 0.8639 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 96/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.8206e-04 - acc: 0.8624Epoch 00095: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.8135e-04 - acc: 0.8621 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 97/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.7966e-04 - acc: 0.8553Epoch 00096: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.7890e-04 - acc: 0.8551 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7991
Epoch 98/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.8018e-04 - acc: 0.8512Epoch 00097: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.7949e-04 - acc: 0.8516 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 99/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.8448e-04 - acc: 0.8600Epoch 00098: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.8510e-04 - acc: 0.8610 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.8037
Epoch 100/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.9427e-04 - acc: 0.8576Epoch 00099: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.9360e-04 - acc: 0.8575 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 101/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.7005e-04 - acc: 0.8618- Epoch 00100: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.7117e-04 - acc: 0.8616 - val_loss: 0.0018 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 102/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.8326e-04 - acc: 0.8688Epoch 00101: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.8333e-04 - acc: 0.8692 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 103/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.7839e-04 - acc: 0.8529Epoch 00102: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.7843e-04 - acc: 0.8522 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 104/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.7492e-04 - acc: 0.8676Epoch 00103: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.7519e-04 - acc: 0.8657 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 105/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.9062e-04 - acc: 0.8518Epoch 00104: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.9159e-04 - acc: 0.8522 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 106/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.7157e-04 - acc: 0.8624Epoch 00105: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.7217e-04 - acc: 0.8621 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7664
Epoch 107/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.7986e-04 - acc: 0.8606Epoch 00106: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.7985e-04 - acc: 0.8610 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7640
Epoch 108/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.6002e-04 - acc: 0.8718Epoch 00107: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.5960e-04 - acc: 0.8709 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 109/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.7474e-04 - acc: 0.8571- Epoch 00108: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.7533e-04 - acc: 0.8575 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.8037
Epoch 110/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.6839e-04 - acc: 0.8729- Epoch 00109: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.6777e-04 - acc: 0.8721 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 111/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.7049e-04 - acc: 0.8582Epoch 00110: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.7101e-04 - acc: 0.8575 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 112/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.7002e-04 - acc: 0.8476Epoch 00111: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.7022e-04 - acc: 0.8470 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 113/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.7176e-04 - acc: 0.8629Epoch 00112: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.7170e-04 - acc: 0.8621 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7944
Epoch 114/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.6097e-04 - acc: 0.8600Epoch 00113: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.6096e-04 - acc: 0.8610 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 115/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.7926e-04 - acc: 0.8676Epoch 00114: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.7864e-04 - acc: 0.8662 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 116/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.6901e-04 - acc: 0.8694- Epoch 00115: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.6908e-04 - acc: 0.8703 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7991
Epoch 117/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.7745e-04 - acc: 0.8647Epoch 00116: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.7709e-04 - acc: 0.8651 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 118/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.5834e-04 - acc: 0.8618Epoch 00117: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.5848e-04 - acc: 0.8621 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 119/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.5779e-04 - acc: 0.8712Epoch 00118: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.5730e-04 - acc: 0.8709 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 120/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.5164e-04 - acc: 0.8712Epoch 00119: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.5152e-04 - acc: 0.8715 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 121/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.6376e-04 - acc: 0.8600Epoch 00120: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.6311e-04 - acc: 0.8598 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 122/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.5281e-04 - acc: 0.8588Epoch 00121: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.5214e-04 - acc: 0.8586 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7944
Epoch 123/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.6051e-04 - acc: 0.8647Epoch 00122: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.6020e-04 - acc: 0.8651 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 124/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.5333e-04 - acc: 0.8653Epoch 00123: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.5341e-04 - acc: 0.8657 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 125/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.5670e-04 - acc: 0.8606Epoch 00124: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.5595e-04 - acc: 0.8604 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7991
Epoch 126/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.5103e-04 - acc: 0.8582Epoch 00125: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.5115e-04 - acc: 0.8563 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 127/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.5643e-04 - acc: 0.8576Epoch 00126: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.5629e-04 - acc: 0.8581 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 128/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.5825e-04 - acc: 0.8771Epoch 00127: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.5834e-04 - acc: 0.8768 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7687
Epoch 129/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.4913e-04 - acc: 0.8618Epoch 00128: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.4944e-04 - acc: 0.8627 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7944
Epoch 130/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.5338e-04 - acc: 0.8629Epoch 00129: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.5277e-04 - acc: 0.8633 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.8061
Epoch 131/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.4204e-04 - acc: 0.8718Epoch 00130: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.4179e-04 - acc: 0.8721 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 132/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.5819e-04 - acc: 0.8576- Epoch 00131: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.5814e-04 - acc: 0.8581 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 133/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.4749e-04 - acc: 0.8535- Epoch 00132: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.4809e-04 - acc: 0.8534 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 134/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.4465e-04 - acc: 0.8606Epoch 00133: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.4411e-04 - acc: 0.8616 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7757
Epoch 135/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.5078e-04 - acc: 0.8600Epoch 00134: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.5074e-04 - acc: 0.8586 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.8014
Epoch 136/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.2949e-04 - acc: 0.8688- Epoch 00135: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.2961e-04 - acc: 0.8686 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 137/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.2610e-04 - acc: 0.8753Epoch 00136: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.2732e-04 - acc: 0.8762 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.8084
Epoch 138/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.4341e-04 - acc: 0.8629Epoch 00137: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.4270e-04 - acc: 0.8627 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 139/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.3493e-04 - acc: 0.8559Epoch 00138: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.3435e-04 - acc: 0.8569 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 140/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.3901e-04 - acc: 0.8635Epoch 00139: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.3870e-04 - acc: 0.8633 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7991
Epoch 141/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.3917e-04 - acc: 0.8659Epoch 00140: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.4002e-04 - acc: 0.8657 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 142/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.3402e-04 - acc: 0.8641Epoch 00141: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.3401e-04 - acc: 0.8639 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 143/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.2727e-04 - acc: 0.8576Epoch 00142: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.2747e-04 - acc: 0.8569 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 144/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.2962e-04 - acc: 0.8729Epoch 00143: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.2979e-04 - acc: 0.8727 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7687
Epoch 145/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.2113e-04 - acc: 0.8588- Epoch 00144: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.2104e-04 - acc: 0.8586 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 146/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.2958e-04 - acc: 0.8600Epoch 00145: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.3037e-04 - acc: 0.8598 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 147/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.2579e-04 - acc: 0.8647- Epoch 00146: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.2548e-04 - acc: 0.8633 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 148/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.3556e-04 - acc: 0.8635Epoch 00147: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.3529e-04 - acc: 0.8639 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7944
Epoch 149/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.3103e-04 - acc: 0.8659Epoch 00148: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.3075e-04 - acc: 0.8662 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 150/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.2378e-04 - acc: 0.8671Epoch 00149: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.2339e-04 - acc: 0.8662 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
In [29]:
plt.plot(history_SGD.history['acc'])
plt.plot(history_SGD.history['val_acc'])
plt.title('model accuracy -- SGD')
plt.ylabel('accuracy')
plt.xlabel('epoch')
plt.legend(['train', 'test'], loc='upper left')
plt.show()
In [30]:
## Train with optimizer -- Adagrad
## 
model_Adagrad = Sequential.from_config(model_config)
model_Adagrad.compile(optimizer='Adagrad', loss='mean_squared_error', metrics=['accuracy'])
checkpointer_Adagrad = ModelCheckpoint(filepath='weights.best.from_Adagrad', 
                               verbose=1, save_best_only=True)
history_Adagrad = model.fit(X_train, y_train,
          epochs=epochs, batch_size=20, validation_split=0.2, callbacks=[checkpointer_Adagrad], verbose=1)
model_Adagrad.save('my_model.h5.Adagrad')
Train on 1712 samples, validate on 428 samples
Epoch 1/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.2186e-04 - acc: 0.8776Epoch 00000: val_loss improved from inf to 0.00134, saving model to weights.best.from_Adagrad
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.2219e-04 - acc: 0.8762 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 2/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.2315e-04 - acc: 0.8482Epoch 00001: val_loss improved from 0.00134 to 0.00125, saving model to weights.best.from_Adagrad
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.2300e-04 - acc: 0.8481 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7757
Epoch 3/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.2644e-04 - acc: 0.8624Epoch 00002: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.2622e-04 - acc: 0.8616 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7944
Epoch 4/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.1995e-04 - acc: 0.8682Epoch 00003: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.1931e-04 - acc: 0.8674 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 5/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.1915e-04 - acc: 0.8729Epoch 00004: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.1960e-04 - acc: 0.8738 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 6/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.2807e-04 - acc: 0.8624Epoch 00005: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.2811e-04 - acc: 0.8616 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 7/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.1422e-04 - acc: 0.8647Epoch 00006: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.1458e-04 - acc: 0.8633 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 8/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.1917e-04 - acc: 0.8765Epoch 00007: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.1918e-04 - acc: 0.8762 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 9/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.2089e-04 - acc: 0.8600Epoch 00008: val_loss improved from 0.00125 to 0.00120, saving model to weights.best.from_Adagrad
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.2129e-04 - acc: 0.8586 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7991
Epoch 10/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.1627e-04 - acc: 0.8700- Epoch 00009: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.1686e-04 - acc: 0.8709 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 11/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.0377e-04 - acc: 0.8665Epoch 00010: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.0335e-04 - acc: 0.8657 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.8014
Epoch 12/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.1175e-04 - acc: 0.8712Epoch 00011: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.1209e-04 - acc: 0.8709 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 13/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.1960e-04 - acc: 0.8541Epoch 00012: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.1924e-04 - acc: 0.8534 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7991
Epoch 14/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.0779e-04 - acc: 0.8647Epoch 00013: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.0768e-04 - acc: 0.8657 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7944
Epoch 15/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.0098e-04 - acc: 0.8665Epoch 00014: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.0073e-04 - acc: 0.8674 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 16/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.1353e-04 - acc: 0.8682Epoch 00015: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.1451e-04 - acc: 0.8674 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 17/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.0326e-04 - acc: 0.8624Epoch 00016: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.0353e-04 - acc: 0.8633 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7991
Epoch 18/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.0450e-04 - acc: 0.8700Epoch 00017: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.0518e-04 - acc: 0.8697 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.8037
Epoch 19/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.9534e-04 - acc: 0.8618Epoch 00018: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.9605e-04 - acc: 0.8610 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 20/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.0840e-04 - acc: 0.8529Epoch 00019: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.0848e-04 - acc: 0.8528 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 21/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.9943e-04 - acc: 0.8624Epoch 00020: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.9919e-04 - acc: 0.8616 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 22/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.9817e-04 - acc: 0.8676Epoch 00021: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.9813e-04 - acc: 0.8668 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 23/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.0867e-04 - acc: 0.8635- Epoch 00022: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.0805e-04 - acc: 0.8639 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 24/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.0091e-04 - acc: 0.8741Epoch 00023: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.0117e-04 - acc: 0.8732 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 25/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.9279e-04 - acc: 0.8765Epoch 00024: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.9265e-04 - acc: 0.8762 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 26/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.0100e-04 - acc: 0.8688Epoch 00025: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 4.0043e-04 - acc: 0.8686 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 27/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.8984e-04 - acc: 0.8759Epoch 00026: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.8912e-04 - acc: 0.8762 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 28/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.9431e-04 - acc: 0.8753Epoch 00027: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.9454e-04 - acc: 0.8750 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 29/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.9166e-04 - acc: 0.8653Epoch 00028: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.9219e-04 - acc: 0.8657 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.8037
Epoch 30/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.9253e-04 - acc: 0.8694Epoch 00029: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.9252e-04 - acc: 0.8697 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 31/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.9148e-04 - acc: 0.8688Epoch 00030: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.9193e-04 - acc: 0.8692 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 32/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.8158e-04 - acc: 0.8753Epoch 00031: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.8079e-04 - acc: 0.8762 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7991
Epoch 33/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.8682e-04 - acc: 0.8612Epoch 00032: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.8705e-04 - acc: 0.8610 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 34/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.8927e-04 - acc: 0.8624Epoch 00033: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.8913e-04 - acc: 0.8627 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 35/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.8458e-04 - acc: 0.8741- Epoch 00034: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.8395e-04 - acc: 0.8744 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 36/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.8848e-04 - acc: 0.8588Epoch 00035: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.8841e-04 - acc: 0.8581 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.8014
Epoch 37/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.8517e-04 - acc: 0.8712Epoch 00036: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.8476e-04 - acc: 0.8715 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.8014
Epoch 38/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.8009e-04 - acc: 0.8612Epoch 00037: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7978e-04 - acc: 0.8621 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7991
Epoch 39/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.8004e-04 - acc: 0.8606Epoch 00038: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7951e-04 - acc: 0.8616 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.8061
Epoch 40/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.7342e-04 - acc: 0.8553- Epoch 00039: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7389e-04 - acc: 0.8546 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.8084
Epoch 41/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.8201e-04 - acc: 0.8635Epoch 00040: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.8298e-04 - acc: 0.8645 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7664
Epoch 42/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.8881e-04 - acc: 0.8665Epoch 00041: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.8865e-04 - acc: 0.8668 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 43/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.7947e-04 - acc: 0.8629Epoch 00042: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7931e-04 - acc: 0.8621 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 44/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.7658e-04 - acc: 0.8847- Epoch 00043: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7682e-04 - acc: 0.8855 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.8014
Epoch 45/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.7774e-04 - acc: 0.8829Epoch 00044: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7753e-04 - acc: 0.8832 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 46/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.7538e-04 - acc: 0.8624Epoch 00045: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7492e-04 - acc: 0.8621 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 47/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.7050e-04 - acc: 0.8753- Epoch 00046: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7061e-04 - acc: 0.8744 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 48/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.7550e-04 - acc: 0.8547Epoch 00047: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7596e-04 - acc: 0.8540 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 49/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.8006e-04 - acc: 0.8647Epoch 00048: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7975e-04 - acc: 0.8657 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 50/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.7969e-04 - acc: 0.8800- Epoch 00049: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7996e-04 - acc: 0.8797 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7944
Epoch 51/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6776e-04 - acc: 0.8712Epoch 00050: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6873e-04 - acc: 0.8721 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7944
Epoch 52/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.7523e-04 - acc: 0.8776Epoch 00051: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7492e-04 - acc: 0.8779 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 53/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6972e-04 - acc: 0.8659Epoch 00052: val_loss improved from 0.00120 to 0.00120, saving model to weights.best.from_Adagrad
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6996e-04 - acc: 0.8651 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.8131
Epoch 54/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.8283e-04 - acc: 0.8618Epoch 00053: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.8294e-04 - acc: 0.8616 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7944
Epoch 55/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.7091e-04 - acc: 0.8629Epoch 00054: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7047e-04 - acc: 0.8616 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7991
Epoch 56/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.7258e-04 - acc: 0.8747- Epoch 00055: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7200e-04 - acc: 0.8756 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 57/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6504e-04 - acc: 0.8588Epoch 00056: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6504e-04 - acc: 0.8575 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.8014
Epoch 58/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.7734e-04 - acc: 0.8671Epoch 00057: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7693e-04 - acc: 0.8680 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.8014
Epoch 59/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.7219e-04 - acc: 0.8753Epoch 00058: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7242e-04 - acc: 0.8756 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 60/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6815e-04 - acc: 0.8771- Epoch 00059: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6714e-04 - acc: 0.8773 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 61/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6354e-04 - acc: 0.8700Epoch 00060: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6362e-04 - acc: 0.8692 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7664
Epoch 62/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.7304e-04 - acc: 0.8724Epoch 00061: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7262e-04 - acc: 0.8727 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 63/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6648e-04 - acc: 0.8759Epoch 00062: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6618e-04 - acc: 0.8756 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 64/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6622e-04 - acc: 0.8635Epoch 00063: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6663e-04 - acc: 0.8639 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.8037
Epoch 65/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.7268e-04 - acc: 0.8735Epoch 00064: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7261e-04 - acc: 0.8738 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 66/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6990e-04 - acc: 0.8788Epoch 00065: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7019e-04 - acc: 0.8791 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 67/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.7090e-04 - acc: 0.8671Epoch 00066: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7113e-04 - acc: 0.8674 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7664
Epoch 68/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5951e-04 - acc: 0.8794Epoch 00067: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6030e-04 - acc: 0.8797 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 69/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6646e-04 - acc: 0.8782Epoch 00068: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6661e-04 - acc: 0.8785 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 70/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5530e-04 - acc: 0.8782Epoch 00069: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5538e-04 - acc: 0.8779 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 71/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6520e-04 - acc: 0.8718Epoch 00070: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6574e-04 - acc: 0.8721 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7991
Epoch 72/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.7066e-04 - acc: 0.8788Epoch 00071: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.7093e-04 - acc: 0.8779 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 73/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6942e-04 - acc: 0.8706Epoch 00072: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6961e-04 - acc: 0.8709 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 74/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5656e-04 - acc: 0.8665Epoch 00073: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5616e-04 - acc: 0.8668 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 75/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5983e-04 - acc: 0.8747Epoch 00074: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5916e-04 - acc: 0.8756 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.8061
Epoch 76/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5774e-04 - acc: 0.8753Epoch 00075: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5759e-04 - acc: 0.8750 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 77/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6030e-04 - acc: 0.8594Epoch 00076: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6085e-04 - acc: 0.8586 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7991
Epoch 78/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5822e-04 - acc: 0.8829Epoch 00077: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5822e-04 - acc: 0.8826 - val_loss: 0.0015 - val_acc: 0.7687
Epoch 79/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6350e-04 - acc: 0.8676Epoch 00078: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6394e-04 - acc: 0.8680 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 80/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5925e-04 - acc: 0.8671Epoch 00079: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5864e-04 - acc: 0.8668 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 81/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6467e-04 - acc: 0.8700Epoch 00080: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6464e-04 - acc: 0.8697 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 82/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5868e-04 - acc: 0.8688Epoch 00081: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5829e-04 - acc: 0.8686 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 83/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4923e-04 - acc: 0.8729Epoch 00082: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4939e-04 - acc: 0.8721 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 84/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5940e-04 - acc: 0.8706Epoch 00083: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6015e-04 - acc: 0.8703 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 85/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6108e-04 - acc: 0.8676Epoch 00084: val_loss improved from 0.00120 to 0.00120, saving model to weights.best.from_Adagrad
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6093e-04 - acc: 0.8674 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 86/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5539e-04 - acc: 0.8729Epoch 00085: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5524e-04 - acc: 0.8727 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 87/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5308e-04 - acc: 0.8600Epoch 00086: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5284e-04 - acc: 0.8598 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.8014
Epoch 88/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5962e-04 - acc: 0.8794Epoch 00087: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5973e-04 - acc: 0.8791 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7944
Epoch 89/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6051e-04 - acc: 0.8712Epoch 00088: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6060e-04 - acc: 0.8692 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 90/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6184e-04 - acc: 0.8582Epoch 00089: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6139e-04 - acc: 0.8581 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 91/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5154e-04 - acc: 0.8818Epoch 00090: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5134e-04 - acc: 0.8820 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7757
Epoch 92/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5800e-04 - acc: 0.8759Epoch 00091: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5854e-04 - acc: 0.8750 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 93/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5517e-04 - acc: 0.8653Epoch 00092: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5564e-04 - acc: 0.8645 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 94/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4896e-04 - acc: 0.8824Epoch 00093: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4923e-04 - acc: 0.8808 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 95/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5052e-04 - acc: 0.8694Epoch 00094: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5016e-04 - acc: 0.8697 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 96/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5284e-04 - acc: 0.8718Epoch 00095: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5261e-04 - acc: 0.8715 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 97/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5589e-04 - acc: 0.8876Epoch 00096: val_loss improved from 0.00120 to 0.00119, saving model to weights.best.from_Adagrad
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5561e-04 - acc: 0.8884 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.8037
Epoch 98/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5501e-04 - acc: 0.8735- Epoch 00097: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5500e-04 - acc: 0.8744 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 99/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5502e-04 - acc: 0.8859Epoch 00098: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5567e-04 - acc: 0.8849 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7593
Epoch 100/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4721e-04 - acc: 0.8741Epoch 00099: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4819e-04 - acc: 0.8750 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 101/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6113e-04 - acc: 0.8712- Epoch 00100: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6093e-04 - acc: 0.8715 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 102/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5270e-04 - acc: 0.8847Epoch 00101: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5305e-04 - acc: 0.8849 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 103/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4940e-04 - acc: 0.8676Epoch 00102: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4969e-04 - acc: 0.8657 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 104/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4334e-04 - acc: 0.8641- Epoch 00103: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4429e-04 - acc: 0.8639 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 105/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.6074e-04 - acc: 0.8735Epoch 00104: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.6036e-04 - acc: 0.8738 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.8014
Epoch 106/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4621e-04 - acc: 0.8576Epoch 00105: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4665e-04 - acc: 0.8581 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 107/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4729e-04 - acc: 0.8900Epoch 00106: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4727e-04 - acc: 0.8896 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.8061
Epoch 108/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5316e-04 - acc: 0.8788Epoch 00107: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5265e-04 - acc: 0.8779 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 109/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4645e-04 - acc: 0.8741Epoch 00108: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4672e-04 - acc: 0.8738 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 110/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4223e-04 - acc: 0.8829Epoch 00109: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4237e-04 - acc: 0.8832 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 111/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4064e-04 - acc: 0.8688Epoch 00110: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4148e-04 - acc: 0.8692 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 112/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4301e-04 - acc: 0.8759- Epoch 00111: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4429e-04 - acc: 0.8768 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 113/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4701e-04 - acc: 0.8741Epoch 00112: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4660e-04 - acc: 0.8750 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.8061
Epoch 114/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4899e-04 - acc: 0.8829- Epoch 00113: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4862e-04 - acc: 0.8820 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 115/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4651e-04 - acc: 0.8671Epoch 00114: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4693e-04 - acc: 0.8668 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.8107
Epoch 116/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5819e-04 - acc: 0.8759Epoch 00115: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5783e-04 - acc: 0.8768 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 117/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4401e-04 - acc: 0.8894Epoch 00116: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4356e-04 - acc: 0.8884 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.8107
Epoch 118/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4957e-04 - acc: 0.8735Epoch 00117: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4948e-04 - acc: 0.8732 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 119/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4407e-04 - acc: 0.8829Epoch 00118: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4384e-04 - acc: 0.8832 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 120/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5185e-04 - acc: 0.8876Epoch 00119: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5253e-04 - acc: 0.8884 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 121/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4554e-04 - acc: 0.8818Epoch 00120: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4526e-04 - acc: 0.8820 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 122/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4691e-04 - acc: 0.8694- Epoch 00121: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4651e-04 - acc: 0.8703 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7804
Epoch 123/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4207e-04 - acc: 0.8771Epoch 00122: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4151e-04 - acc: 0.8762 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 124/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4338e-04 - acc: 0.8706Epoch 00123: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4288e-04 - acc: 0.8697 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 125/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4900e-04 - acc: 0.8800Epoch 00124: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4878e-04 - acc: 0.8803 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7734
Epoch 126/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5127e-04 - acc: 0.8635Epoch 00125: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5156e-04 - acc: 0.8645 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 127/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5446e-04 - acc: 0.8659Epoch 00126: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5439e-04 - acc: 0.8662 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 128/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4467e-04 - acc: 0.8659Epoch 00127: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4437e-04 - acc: 0.8668 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 129/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.3962e-04 - acc: 0.8665- Epoch 00128: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.3879e-04 - acc: 0.8674 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7944
Epoch 130/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4272e-04 - acc: 0.8894Epoch 00129: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4222e-04 - acc: 0.8902 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7757
Epoch 131/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4945e-04 - acc: 0.8776- Epoch 00130: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4913e-04 - acc: 0.8785 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 132/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4662e-04 - acc: 0.8753Epoch 00131: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4675e-04 - acc: 0.8750 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7780
Epoch 133/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5090e-04 - acc: 0.8718Epoch 00132: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5023e-04 - acc: 0.8721 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 134/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.3803e-04 - acc: 0.8665Epoch 00133: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.3843e-04 - acc: 0.8674 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.8037
Epoch 135/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4900e-04 - acc: 0.8753Epoch 00134: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4860e-04 - acc: 0.8762 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 136/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.3933e-04 - acc: 0.8818Epoch 00135: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.3882e-04 - acc: 0.8820 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 137/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.3760e-04 - acc: 0.8741- Epoch 00136: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.3720e-04 - acc: 0.8744 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7874
Epoch 138/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.3923e-04 - acc: 0.8706Epoch 00137: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.3915e-04 - acc: 0.8709 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 139/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.3458e-04 - acc: 0.8806- Epoch 00138: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.3477e-04 - acc: 0.8803 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7710
Epoch 140/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.5147e-04 - acc: 0.8776Epoch 00139: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.5225e-04 - acc: 0.8779 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.8084
Epoch 141/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4045e-04 - acc: 0.8753Epoch 00140: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4105e-04 - acc: 0.8762 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 142/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.3320e-04 - acc: 0.8859Epoch 00141: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.3321e-04 - acc: 0.8861 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7944
Epoch 143/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.3470e-04 - acc: 0.8788Epoch 00142: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.3415e-04 - acc: 0.8785 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7850
Epoch 144/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.3467e-04 - acc: 0.8700- Epoch 00143: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.3505e-04 - acc: 0.8703 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7967
Epoch 145/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.4235e-04 - acc: 0.8829Epoch 00144: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.4210e-04 - acc: 0.8826 - val_loss: 0.0014 - val_acc: 0.7827
Epoch 146/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.3383e-04 - acc: 0.8782- Epoch 00145: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.3409e-04 - acc: 0.8779 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7897
Epoch 147/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.3717e-04 - acc: 0.8788Epoch 00146: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.3737e-04 - acc: 0.8773 - val_loss: 0.0012 - val_acc: 0.7921
Epoch 148/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.3354e-04 - acc: 0.8788Epoch 00147: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.3358e-04 - acc: 0.8791 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.8014
Epoch 149/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.3519e-04 - acc: 0.8700Epoch 00148: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.3541e-04 - acc: 0.8680 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.7944
Epoch 150/150
1700/1712 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 3.3336e-04 - acc: 0.8724Epoch 00149: val_loss did not improve
1712/1712 [==============================] - 3s - loss: 3.3299e-04 - acc: 0.8727 - val_loss: 0.0013 - val_acc: 0.8014
In [31]:
plt.plot(history_Adagrad.history['acc'])
plt.plot(history_Adagrad.history['val_acc'])
plt.title('model accuracy -- Adagrad')
plt.ylabel('accuracy')
plt.xlabel('epoch')
plt.legend(['train', 'test'], loc='upper left')
plt.show()

Visualize a Subset of the Test Predictions

Execute the code cell below to visualize your model's predicted keypoints on a subset of the testing images.

In [47]:
# model = load_model('my_model.h5')
model = load_model('weights.best.from_Adagrad')
In [48]:
y_test = model.predict(X_test)
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(20,20))
fig.subplots_adjust(left=0, right=1, bottom=0, top=1, hspace=0.05, wspace=0.05)
for i in range(9):
    ax = fig.add_subplot(3, 3, i + 1, xticks=[], yticks=[])
    plot_data(X_test[i], y_test[i], ax)

Step 8: Complete the pipeline

With the work you did in Sections 1 and 2 of this notebook, along with your freshly trained facial keypoint detector, you can now complete the full pipeline. That is given a color image containing a person or persons you can now

  • Detect the faces in this image automatically using OpenCV
  • Predict the facial keypoints in each face detected in the image
  • Paint predicted keypoints on each face detected

In this Subsection you will do just this!

(IMPLEMENTATION) Facial Keypoints Detector

Use the OpenCV face detection functionality you built in previous Sections to expand the functionality of your keypoints detector to color images with arbitrary size. Your function should perform the following steps

  1. Accept a color image.
  2. Convert the image to grayscale.
  3. Detect and crop the face contained in the image.
  4. Locate the facial keypoints in the cropped image.
  5. Overlay the facial keypoints in the original (color, uncropped) image.

Note: step 4 can be the trickiest because remember your convolutional network is only trained to detect facial keypoints in $96 \times 96$ grayscale images where each pixel was normalized to lie in the interval $[0,1]$, and remember that each facial keypoint was normalized during training to the interval $[-1,1]$. This means - practically speaking - to paint detected keypoints onto a test face you need to perform this same pre-processing to your candidate face - that is after detecting it you should resize it to $96 \times 96$ and normalize its values before feeding it into your facial keypoint detector. To be shown correctly on the original image the output keypoints from your detector then need to be shifted and re-normalized from the interval $[-1,1]$ to the width and height of your detected face.

When complete you should be able to produce example images like the one below

In [34]:
# Load in color image for face detection
image = cv2.imread('images/obamas4.jpg')


# Convert the image to RGB colorspace
image = cv2.cvtColor(image, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)


# plot our image
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (9,9))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])
ax1.set_title('image copy')
ax1.imshow(image)
Out[34]:
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fd945d012e8>
In [35]:
### TODO: Use the face detection code we saw in Section 1 with your trained conv-net 
# Convert the RGB  image to grayscale
gray = cv2.cvtColor(image, cv2.COLOR_RGB2GRAY)

# Extract the pre-trained face detector from an xml file
face_cascade = cv2.CascadeClassifier('detector_architectures/haarcascade_frontalface_default.xml')

# Detect the faces in image
faces = face_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray, 1.25, 6)

# Print the number of faces detected in the image
print('Number of faces detected:', len(faces))

# Make a copy of the orginal image to draw face detections on
image_with_detections = np.copy(image)

# Get the bounding box for each detected face
all_faces_gray = []
all_faces = []
for (x,y,w,h) in faces:
    # Add a red bounding box to the detections image
    # cv2.rectangle(image_with_detections, (x,y), (x+w,y+h), (255,0,0), 3)
    # Corp the color face
    face = image[y:y+h, x:x+w]
    all_faces.append(face)
    # Corp the gray face
    face_gray = gray[y:y+h, x:x+w]
    print("face_gray.shape == {}".format(face_gray.shape))
    # Resize the face image to fit the input size of CNN model
    face_resized = cv2.resize(face_gray, (96,96))
    print("face_resized.shape == {}".format(face_resized.shape))
    # Display the detectd face
    fig = plt.figure(figsize = (6,6))
    ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
    ax1.set_xticks([])
    ax1.set_yticks([])
    ax1.set_title('Detected faces')
    ax1.imshow(face_resized)
    # Scale pixel values to [0, 1]
    face_resized = face_resized/255
    print(type(face_resized))
    # Append the processed face to all_faces_gray
    all_faces_gray.append(face_resized)

# Create numpy array
all_faces_gray = np.array(all_faces_gray)
# Return each images as 96 x 96 x 1
all_faces_gray = all_faces_gray.reshape(-1, 96, 96, 1)
print("all_faces_gray.shape == {}".format(all_faces_gray.shape))

# Print the keypoints on detected faces
keypoints = model.predict(all_faces_gray)
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(20,20))
fig.subplots_adjust(left=0, right=1, bottom=0, top=1, hspace=0.05, wspace=0.05)
for i in range(2):
    ax = fig.add_subplot(3, 3, i + 1, xticks=[], yticks=[])
    plot_data(all_faces_gray[i], keypoints[i], ax)
    
Number of faces detected: 2
face_gray.shape == (175, 175)
face_resized.shape == (96, 96)
<class 'numpy.ndarray'>
face_gray.shape == (166, 166)
face_resized.shape == (96, 96)
<class 'numpy.ndarray'>
all_faces_gray.shape == (2, 96, 96, 1)
In [36]:
## TODO : Paint the predicted keypoints on the test image
# Undo the normalization
keypoints = keypoints * 48 + 48 
idx = 0
for (x,y,w,h) in faces:
    keypoint = keypoints[idx]
    # Calculate the scaling to map the keypoint back to original face image
    face_resized = all_faces_gray[idx]
    scaling = h / face_resized.shape[0]
    # Map the keypoint back to original face image
    keypoint = keypoint * scaling
    # Save the keypoint
    keypoints[idx] = keypoint
    # Display keypoints on original face image
    image_copy = np.copy(image)
    face = image_copy[y:y+h, x:x+w]
    i = 0
    while (i < keypoint.size):
        cv2.circle(face, (keypoint[i],keypoint[i+1]), 2, (0,255,0), 2)
        i = i + 2
    image_with_detections[y:y+h, x:x+w] = face
    # Display the face
    fig = plt.figure(figsize = (6,6))
    ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
    ax1.set_xticks([])
    ax1.set_yticks([])
    ax1.set_title('Face with keypoint')
    ax1.imshow(face)
    # Add a red bounding box to the detections image
    cv2.rectangle(image_with_detections, (x,y), (x+w,y+h), (255,0,0), 3)
    idx = idx + 1
    
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (6,6))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])
ax1.set_title('image_with_detections')
ax1.imshow(image_with_detections)
Out[36]:
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fd9efdff0b8>

(Optional) Further Directions - add a filter using facial keypoints to your laptop camera

Now you can add facial keypoint detection to your laptop camera - as illustrated in the gif below.

The next Python cell contains the basic laptop video camera function used in the previous optional video exercises. Combine it with the functionality you developed for keypoint detection and marking in the previous exercise and you should be good to go!

In [37]:
import cv2
import time 
from keras.models import load_model
def laptop_camera_go():
    # Create instance of video capturer
    cv2.namedWindow("face detection activated")
    vc = cv2.VideoCapture(0)

    # Try to get the first frame
    if vc.isOpened(): 
        rval, frame = vc.read()
    else:
        rval = False
    
    # keep video stream open
    while rval:
        # plot image from camera with detections marked
        cv2.imshow("face detection activated", frame)
        
        # exit functionality - press any key to exit laptop video
        key = cv2.waitKey(20)
        if key > 0: # exit by pressing any key
            # destroy windows
            cv2.destroyAllWindows()
            
            # hack from stack overflow for making sure window closes on osx --> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6116564/destroywindow-does-not-close-window-on-mac-using-python-and-opencv
            for i in range (1,5):
                cv2.waitKey(1)
            return
        
        # read next frame
        time.sleep(0.05)             # control framerate for computation - default 20 frames per sec
        rval, frame = vc.read()  
In [38]:
# Run your keypoint face painter
#laptop_camera_go()

(Optional) Further Directions - add a filter using facial keypoints

Using your freshly minted facial keypoint detector pipeline you can now do things like add fun filters to a person's face automatically. In this optional exercise you can play around with adding sunglasses automatically to each individual's face in an image as shown in a demonstration image below.

To produce this effect an image of a pair of sunglasses shown in the Python cell below.

In [39]:
# Load in sunglasses image - note the usage of the special option
# cv2.IMREAD_UNCHANGED, this option is used because the sunglasses 
# image has a 4th channel that allows us to control how transparent each pixel in the image is
sunglasses = cv2.imread("images/sunglasses_4.png", cv2.IMREAD_UNCHANGED)

# Plot the image
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (6,6))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])
ax1.imshow(sunglasses)
ax1.axis('off');

This image is placed over each individual's face using the detected eye points to determine the location of the sunglasses, and eyebrow points to determine the size that the sunglasses should be for each person (one could also use the nose point to determine this).

Notice that this image actually has 4 channels, not just 3.

In [40]:
# Print out the shape of the sunglasses image
print ('The sunglasses image has shape: ' + str(np.shape(sunglasses)))
The sunglasses image has shape: (1123, 3064, 4)

It has the usual red, blue, and green channels any color image has, with the 4th channel representing the transparency level of each pixel in the image. Here's how the transparency channel works: the lower the value, the more transparent the pixel will become. The lower bound (completely transparent) is zero here, so any pixels set to 0 will not be seen.

This is how we can place this image of sunglasses on someone's face and still see the area around of their face where the sunglasses lie - because these pixels in the sunglasses image have been made completely transparent.

Lets check out the alpha channel of our sunglasses image in the next Python cell. Note because many of the pixels near the boundary are transparent we'll need to explicitly print out non-zero values if we want to see them.

In [41]:
# Print out the sunglasses transparency (alpha) channel
alpha_channel = sunglasses[:,:,3]
print ('the alpha channel here looks like')
print (alpha_channel)

# Just to double check that there are indeed non-zero values
# Let's find and print out every value greater than zero
values = np.where(alpha_channel != 0)
print ('\n the non-zero values of the alpha channel look like')
print (values)
the alpha channel here looks like
[[0 0 0 ..., 0 0 0]
 [0 0 0 ..., 0 0 0]
 [0 0 0 ..., 0 0 0]
 ..., 
 [0 0 0 ..., 0 0 0]
 [0 0 0 ..., 0 0 0]
 [0 0 0 ..., 0 0 0]]

 the non-zero values of the alpha channel look like
(array([  17,   17,   17, ..., 1109, 1109, 1109]), array([ 687,  688,  689, ..., 2376, 2377, 2378]))

This means that when we place this sunglasses image on top of another image, we can use the transparency channel as a filter to tell us which pixels to overlay on a new image (only the non-transparent ones with values greater than zero).

One last thing: it's helpful to understand which keypoint belongs to the eyes, mouth, etc. So, in the image below, we also display the index of each facial keypoint directly on the image so that you can tell which keypoints are for the eyes, eyebrows, etc.

With this information, you're well on your way to completing this filtering task! See if you can place the sunglasses automatically on the individuals in the image loaded in / shown in the next Python cell.

In [42]:
# Load in color image for face detection
image = cv2.imread('images/obamas4.jpg')

# Convert the image to RGB colorspace
image = cv2.cvtColor(image, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)


# Plot the image
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (8,8))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])
ax1.set_title('Original Image')
ax1.imshow(image)
Out[42]:
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fd9efd366a0>
In [43]:
def blend_transparent(face, sunglasses, y_offset, x_offset):
    l_img = np.copy(face)
    s_img = np.copy(sunglasses)
    
    y1, y2 = y_offset, y_offset + s_img.shape[0]
    x1, x2 = x_offset, x_offset + s_img.shape[1]

    alpha_s = s_img[:, :, 3] / 255.0
    alpha_l = 1.0 - alpha_s

    for c in range(0, 3):
        l_img[y1:y2, x1:x2, c] = (alpha_s * s_img[:, :, c] +
                                  alpha_l * l_img[y1:y2, x1:x2, c])
        
    return l_img
In [44]:
## (Optional) TODO: Use the face detection code we saw in Section 1 with your trained conv-net to put
## sunglasses on the individuals in our test image

# Add alpha channel in image
b_channel, g_channel, r_channel = cv2.split(image)
alpha_channel = np.ones(b_channel.shape, dtype=b_channel.dtype) * 255 # creating a 255 alpha channel image.
image = cv2.merge((b_channel, g_channel, r_channel, alpha_channel))

idx = 0
image_with_sunglasses = np.copy(image)
for (x,y,w,h) in faces:
    image_copy = np.copy(image)
    # Get the keypoint of this face
    keypoint = keypoints[idx]
    # Corp the face
    face = image_copy[y:y+h, x:x+w]
    # Get the size of the sunglasses
    sunglasses_height, sunglasses_width = sunglasses.shape[0], sunglasses.shape[1]
    # Get eye keypoint coordinates
    keypoint_7_y, keypoint_7_x = int(round(keypoint[7*2+1])), int(round(keypoint[7*2]))
    keypoint_9_y, keypoint_9_x = int(round(keypoint[9*2+1])), int(round(keypoint[9*2]))
    # Get the width of the eyes = x of 7th - x of 9th
    eye_width = keypoint_7_x - keypoint_9_x
    # Resize sunglasses to fit on the face
    sunglasses_resized = cv2.resize(sunglasses, (eye_width,int(round(eye_width/sunglasses_width*sunglasses_height))))
    # Paint the sunglasses on the face    
    face = blend_transparent(face, sunglasses_resized, keypoint_9_y, keypoint_9_x)
    # Put back to the image_with_sunglasses
    image_with_sunglasses[y:y+h, x:x+w] = face
    
    
# Print the image_with_sunglasses
fig = plt.figure(figsize = (6,6))
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax1.set_xticks([])
ax1.set_yticks([])
ax1.set_title('image_with_sunglasses')
ax1.imshow(image_with_sunglasses)
Out[44]:
<matplotlib.image.AxesImage at 0x7fd9efc8fe80>

(Optional) Further Directions - add a filter using facial keypoints to your laptop camera

Now you can add the sunglasses filter to your laptop camera - as illustrated in the gif below.

The next Python cell contains the basic laptop video camera function used in the previous optional video exercises. Combine it with the functionality you developed for adding sunglasses to someone's face in the previous optional exercise and you should be good to go!

In [45]:
import cv2
import time 
from keras.models import load_model
import numpy as np

def laptop_camera_go():
    # Create instance of video capturer
    cv2.namedWindow("face detection activated")
    vc = cv2.VideoCapture(0)

    # try to get the first frame
    if vc.isOpened(): 
        rval, frame = vc.read()
    else:
        rval = False
    
    # Keep video stream open
    while rval:
        # Plot image from camera with detections marked
        cv2.imshow("face detection activated", frame)
        
        # Exit functionality - press any key to exit laptop video
        key = cv2.waitKey(20)
        if key > 0: # exit by pressing any key
            # Destroy windows 
            cv2.destroyAllWindows()
            
            for i in range (1,5):
                cv2.waitKey(1)
            return
        
        # Read next frame
        time.sleep(0.05)             # control framerate for computation - default 20 frames per sec
        rval, frame = vc.read()    
        
In [46]:
# Load facial landmark detector model
model = load_model('my_model.h5')

# Run sunglasses painter
#laptop_camera_go()